I have some concerns, like the updateValue
function. I was trying to follow the functional paradigm, but I wonder if I could use another approach or something.
My parsing function seems overly complicated, particularly the '['
case seems complicated. Any other comments are appreciated too!
namespace Brainfuck
module Interpreter =
type public ProgramState =
{ Pointer : int
Memory : Map<int, int> }
let private currentValue state = Map.find state.Pointer state.Memory
let private updateValue state op =
let updateMemory =
match Map.tryFind state.Pointer state.Memory with
| Some(x) ->
let m = Map.remove state.Pointer state.Memory
Map.add state.Pointer (op x) m
| None -> Map.add state.Pointer (op 0) state.Memory
{ state with Memory = updateMemory }
type private Command =
| SimpleCommand of char
| Loop of Command list
let private parse code =
let literals = [ '+'; '-'; '>'; '<'; '.'; ',' ] |> Set.ofList
let rec parsing =
function
| x :: xs when x = '[' ->
let innerLoop, innerRemaining = parsing xs
let commands, remaining = parsing innerRemaining
let remainingCommands, after = parsing remaining
Loop(innerLoop) :: commands @ remainingCommands, after
| x :: xs when x = ']' -> [], xs
| x :: xs when Set.contains x literals ->
let commands, remaining = parsing xs
SimpleCommand(x) :: commands, remaining
| x :: xs -> parsing xs
| [] -> [], []
code
|> Seq.toList
|> parsing
|> fst
let private interpretSimpleCommand state command =
match command with
| '>' -> { state with Pointer = (state.Pointer + 1) }
| '<' -> { state with Pointer = (state.Pointer - 1) }
| '+' -> updateValue state (fun x -> x + 1)
| '-' -> updateValue state (fun x -> x - 1)
| '.' ->
printf "%c" <| (char) (currentValue state)
state
| ',' -> updateValue state (fun x -> System.Console.Read())
| _ -> failwith "invalid command"
let private compute bytecode =
let rec cmp state cmd =
match cmd with
| SimpleCommand(x) -> interpretSimpleCommand state x
| Loop(xs) ->
let nextState = computeProgram state xs
if currentValue (nextState) = 0 then nextState
else cmp nextState cmd
and computeProgram = List.fold cmp
computeProgram { Pointer = 0
Memory = Map.empty<int, int> } bytecode
let public eval code =
code
|> parse
|> compute
1 Answer 1
let private currentValue state = Map.find state.Pointer state.Memory
This won't work correctly if you try to access memory that hasn't been set yet. Doing that should return 0
, but will instead throw an exception. You can fix that by using Map.tryFind
together with defaultArg
:
let private currentValue state = defaultArg (Map.tryFind state.Pointer state.Memory) 0
let m = Map.remove state.Pointer state.Memory
Map.add state.Pointer (op x) m
You don't need to remove
before add
ing the key back in, because add
will overwrite the old value. (The documentation isn't clear on that.)
This also means you can make your code more DRY by using currentValue
:
let updateMemory =
Map.add state.Pointer (op (currentValue state)) state.Memory
let rec parsing =
I think that parsing
is a weird name for a function, function names should be verbs. Since you're already using parse
, if you can't figure out any better name, you could use something like parseInternal
or parse'
.
| x :: xs when x = '[' ->
let innerLoop, innerRemaining = parsing xs
let commands, remaining = parsing innerRemaining
let remainingCommands, after = parsing remaining
Loop(innerLoop) :: commands @ remainingCommands, after
This code doesn't make any sense to me. And testing it on Wikipedia's Hello World program gives me incorrect results. Instead, I think it should look like this:
| x :: xs when x = '[' ->
let innerLoop, innerRemaining = parsing xs
let commands, remaining = parsing innerRemaining
Loop(innerLoop) :: commands, remaining
code
|> Seq.toList
|> parsing
|> fst
This means that if you encounter unmatched ]
, you're going to treat it as the end of the file. Is that the correct behavior?
And thinking about unmatched brackets some more, unmatched [
are automatically closed at the end of the input. Is that correct?
(fun x -> x + 1)
You can shorten this to: ((+) 1)
.
let private compute bytecode =
I think that bytecode
is a misleading name here, since it's not a code composed of bytes, it's an AST.
| Loop(xs) ->
let nextState = computeProgram state xs
if currentValue (nextState) = 0 then nextState
else cmp nextState cmd
This is not correct. Brainfuck loops are equivalent to while
loops, not do while
loops. The correct code would be something like:
| Loop(xs) ->
if currentValue state = 0
then state
else
let nextState = computeProgram state xs
cmp nextState cmd
x::xs when x = '['
with'['::xs
I believe. \$\endgroup\$Map.empty<int, int>
are not needed. \$\endgroup\$