2
\$\begingroup\$

Given a set of numbers insert them so that they are ordered ie.

add(5)
add(3)
add(6)
add(2)
Output: 6 5 3 2
GetNumber() returns the number of that term
insertAfter() inserts that node after the pointer
insertAtHead() inserts as the head node
Term is the Node which holds the number

How can I refactor this working code?

 boolean inserted = false; 
 Node pointer = head;
 if (pointer == null || term.getNumber() > pointer.data.getNumber()) {
 // If head is empty insert there or if term is larger than head.
 insertAtHead(term);
 } else if(pointer.next == null) {
 insertAfter(term, head);
 } else {
 while (pointer.next != null) {
 //Insert at end.
 if (term.getNumber() > pointer.next.data.getNumber()) {
 insertAfter(term, pointer);
 inserted = true;
 break;
 }
 pointer = pointer.next;
 }
 if (!inserted) {
 //If not inserted it must be the smallest so add to the end.
 insertAfter(term, pointer);
 }
 }
 printList();
Legato
9,9294 gold badges50 silver badges118 bronze badges
asked Mar 17, 2015 at 20:39
\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$
  • You don't need the else if(pointer.next == null) case, it's covered by if (!inserted).
  • Declare variables in as small a scope as possible to increase readability. inserted and pointer aren't needed until the while loop.
  • You can save a nesting level if you put your code into a insertSorted method, and then call printList afterwards in the calling method. That way, you can write the initial head insert as a guard clause and thus save the else.
  • You could also save the break by adding && !inserted to the while clause.
  • many of your comments just repeat the code they comment on, and are thus not really needed.
  • // Insert at end. is quite misleading, as the insert doesn't happen at the end of the list.

With all these changes, your code already looks a bit cleaner:

if (head == null || term.getNumber() > head.data.getNumber()) {
 insertAtHead(term);
 return;
}
Node pointer = head;
boolean inserted = false;
while (pointer.next != null && !inserted) {
 if (term.getNumber() > pointer.next.data.getNumber()) {
 insertAfter(term, pointer);
 inserted = true;
 }
 pointer = pointer.next;
}
if (!inserted) {
 //If not inserted it must be the smallest so add to the end.
 insertAfter(term, pointer);
}

You could also return early after inserting, and thus get rid of the inserted variable:

// guard clause for head insert
Node pointer = head;
while (pointer.next != null) {
 if (term.getNumber() > pointer.next.data.getNumber()) {
 insertAfter(term, pointer);
 return;
 }
 pointer = pointer.next;
}
//If not inserted it must be the smallest so add to the end.
insertAfter(term, pointer);

But you still have a separate case for the last insert which is a bit ugly. You should be able to get rid of it with something like this:

// guard clause for head insert
Node pointer = head;
while (pointer.next != null && term.getNumber() < pointer.next.data.getNumber()) {
 pointer = pointer.next;
}
insertAfter(term, pointer);
answered Mar 17, 2015 at 21:53
\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.