Here I am trying to avoid hardcoding in flash messages by using I18n. Also, I have tried to use a CSS selector for submitting the form to make the tests less brittle (I don't really care that much about what the text on the button is - more what happens when submitting).
Is this a good approach for making tests less brittle due to translation changes?
RSpec.feature "Classic Authentication" do
let(:submit) { find(:css, 'input[type="submit"]') }
let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }
context 'Registation' do
background do
visit new_user_registration_path
page.fill_in 'Email', with: '[email protected]'
page.fill_in 'Password', with: 'P4ssword'
page.fill_in 'Password confirmation', with: 'P4ssword'
end
scenario "when I sign up with valid info" do
submit.click
expect(page).to have_content I18n.t('devise.registrations.signed_up')
expect(page).to have_content I18n.t('user.sign_out')
end
scenario "when I sign up with invalid info" do
page.fill_in 'Email', with: 'testasdas'
submit.click
expect(page).to have_content 'Email is invalid'
expect(page).to_not have_content I18n.t('devise.registrations.signed_up')
end
end
context 'Log in' do
background do
visit '/'
click_link I18n.t('user.sign_in')
page.fill_in 'Email', with: user.email
end
scenario 'when I sign in with valid details.' do
page.fill_in 'Password', with: 'P4ssword'
submit.click
expect(page).to have_content I18n.t('devise.sessions.signed_in')
expect(page).to have_link I18n.t('user.sign_out')
end
scenario 'when I sign in with an invalid password' do
page.fill_in 'Password', with: 'H4XX0R'
submit.click
expect(page).to_not have_content I18n.t('devise.sessions.signed_in')
end
end
end
2 Answers 2
Seems OK to me.
However, it might be nice to add a "macro" to let you skip the I18n.
and just use t
like you do in views.
And you can add some extra checks while you're at it, since you'll i18n want it to make noise when testing.
For instance, you could add a file like spec/support/macros/i18n_macros.rb
with the following:
module I18nMacros
def t(*args)
I18n.translate!(*args)
end
end
Using translate!
will cause i18n to raise an exception if the translation you're looking for doesn't exist.
Then include it in spec_helper.rb
config.include I18nMacros
or alternatively include it for type: :feature
specs only.
And if you haven't already (it's default for newer versions of Rails), set i18n to raise exceptions in your views (the above will only raise on the stuff in your tests). Put something like this in config/environments/test.rb
# Raises error for missing translations
config.action_view.raise_on_missing_translations = true
-
\$\begingroup\$ Nice, but I can't get RubyMine to complete the translations keys in
I18nMacros::t
which is a feature I find a little hard to live without. \$\endgroup\$papirtiger– papirtiger2014年11月15日 23:24:55 +00:00Commented Nov 15, 2014 at 23:24
My suggestions would be:
Create a helper for common sign up and sign in logic:
# E.g. spec/support/helpers/session_helpers.rb module Features module SessionHelpers def sign_up_with(email, password, confirmation) visit new_user_registration_path fill_in 'Email', with: email fill_in 'Password', with: password fill_in 'Password confirmation', with: confirmation click_button 'Sign up' end def signin(email, password) visit new_user_session_path fill_in 'Email', with: email fill_in 'Password', with: password click_button 'Sign in' end end end
And include it in
spec/support/helpers.rb
:require 'support/helpers/session_helpers'
And use it like this:
scenario "when I sign up with invalid info" do sign_up_with('testasdas', '', '') expect(page).to have_content 'Email is invalid' end
Courtesy Daniel Kehoe, comes for free if you use his awesome Rails Composer.
Rather than a binary valid/invalid sign up test, you might want to be more fine grained by testing each field (email, password, password confirmation etc.) separately like in this example.
Get rid of
I18n .
so you can uset(...)
just like in views:# spec/spec_helper.rb RSpec.configure do |config| # ... config.include AbstractController::Translation # ... end
Courtesy thoughtbot.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the reply. Since I am using warden I can use the warden test helpers to sign in/out in the test setup. This is much faster than acually loading and posting the signup page. I just go though the actual front-end for feature specs which test the actual sign in process. \$\endgroup\$papirtiger– papirtiger2015年08月15日 09:38:57 +00:00Commented Aug 15, 2015 at 9:38