6
\$\begingroup\$

Given a shape, get all triangles that can be possible by connecting the points.

Example: given 3 points, only 1 triangle is possible, but given a pentagon, 10 are possible.

Also the combination formula is \$\dfrac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}\$. Does it mean \$O(n!)\$ is the complexity?

Looking for:

  1. Code review optimization and best practices.
  2. Verifying complexity:

    Time: \$O\left(\dfrac{n!}{r! (n-r)!}\right)\$ - which I guess is the same as \$O(n!)\$.

    Space: \$O\left(\dfrac{n!}{r! (n-r)!} \cdot r\right)\$ - space occupied by the list to be returned.

public final class GetTriangles {
 private GetTriangles() {}
 /**
 * Returns the list of all the triangles possible, given the input shape.
 * If the less than three points are returned it causes illegal argument exception
 */
 public static List<int[]> combinate (int n) {
 if (n < 3) throw new IllegalArgumentException("The input shape has less than 3 points: " + n);
 final List<int[]> list = new ArrayList<int[]>();
 for (int i = 1; i < n - 1; i++) {
 compute(i, new int[3], 0, n, list);
 }
 return list;
 }
 private static void compute(int startFrom, int[] a, int arrPosition, int n, List<int[]> list) {
 if (arrPosition == a.length - 1) {
 a[arrPosition] = startFrom; 
 list.add(Arrays.copyOf(a, a.length));
 return;
 }
 a[arrPosition] = startFrom; 
 for (int i = startFrom + 1; i <= n; i++) {
 compute(i, a, arrPosition + 1, n, list);
 }
 }
 public static void main(String[] args) { 
 final List<int[]> list = combinate(5);
 int[] a1 = {1, 2, 3};
 int[] a2 = {1, 2, 4};
 int[] a3 = {1, 2, 5};
 int[] a4 = {1, 3, 4};
 int[] a5 = {1, 3, 5};
 int[] a6 = {1, 4, 5};
 int[] a7 = {2, 3, 4};
 int[] a8 = {2, 3, 5};
 int[] a9 = {2, 4, 5};
 int[] a10 = {3, 4, 5};
 final List<int[]> list1 = Arrays.asList(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10);
 for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
 assertArrayEquals(list.get(i), list1.get(i));
 }
 }
}
asked May 12, 2014 at 19:41
\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ ... but given a polygon 10 are possible" <- makes little sense... what polygon? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2014 at 20:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ oops - goofed pentagon with polygon. Sorry \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2014 at 20:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ @rolfl implemented optimistic recursion as you suggested in one of previous reviews :) thanks \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2014 at 21:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't think your test is great, because it expects a particular order for the result, and there is nothing in the problem that requires any particular order. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 28, 2015 at 20:20

1 Answer 1

5
\$\begingroup\$

No, it doesn't mean \$O(n!)\$ complexity. The \$(n-r)\$ in the denominator cancels most of the terms in the numerator. For choosing three points to make a triangle, \$r\$ = 3, and so your actual expression is \$\frac{(n)(n-1)(n-2)}{3!}\$ => \$\frac{(n^3-3n^2+2n)}{3!}\$ => \$O(n^3)\$.

So you should expect \$O(n^3)\$ time, and \$O(3*n^3)\$ => \$O(n^3)\$ space.

Next thought - if you are going to be working with triangles, you need to know where the points are (so that you can check whether or not the points are co-linear). What your code currently does is seek out every 3-tuple combination of vertices; so you are (possibly) missing part of the problem.

That said, breaking the triangle problem into two distinct pieces is a good idea; because you do need to enumerate the vertices anyway, and treating them as ordered tuples gives you a good way to avoid extra work.

But trying to enumerate the tuples using recursion... that's a bad idea. Better would be to simply enumerate the combinations using squashed ordering. Thomas Andrews has a nice illustration of that technique on a more complicated problem.

Jamal
35.2k13 gold badges134 silver badges238 bronze badges
answered May 12, 2014 at 22:52
\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.