I'm just started learning TDD with Rails and RSpec. This is my first test for controller. Just plain RESTful UserController that responds with JSON, so it has no new and edit methods. Please review it
require 'spec_helper'
describe UsersController do
let(:users) { 4.times.map { create(:user) } }
describe '#index' do
before(:each) { get :index }
it 'assigns all users to @users' do
expect(assigns(:users)).to match_array users
end
it 'success' do
expect(response).to be_success
end
end
describe '#show' do
context 'when requested user exists' do
let(:user) { users[rand 4] }
before(:each) { get :show, id: user.id }
it 'success' do
expect(response).to be_success
end
it 'assigns it to @user' do
expect(assigns(:user)).to eq user
end
end
context 'when requested user does not exists' do
it 'throws ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound' do
expect { get :show, id: -1 }.to raise_exception ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound
end
end
end
describe '#create' do
before(:each) { post :create, ** user_attrs }
context 'when valid' do
let(:user_attrs) { attributes_for(:user) }
it 'success' do
expect(response).to be_success
end
it 'saves and assigns new user to @user' do
user = assigns(:user)
expect(user).to be_kind_of ActiveRecord::Base
expect(user).to be_persisted
expect(users).not_to include user
end
end
context 'when invalid' do
let(:user_attrs) { attributes_for(:invalid_user) }
it 'fails' do
expect(response).not_to be_success
end
it 'assigns user to @user' do
expect(assigns(:user)).to be_kind_of ActiveRecord::Base
end
end
end
describe '#update' do
let(:user) { create(:user) }
before(:each) { patch :update, ** new_values, id: user.id }
context 'when valid' do
let(:new_values) { attributes_for(:user) }
it 'success' do
expect(response).to be_success
end
it 'saves and assigns user to @user' do
expect(assigns(:user)).to eq user
end
it 'saves updates' do
expect { user.reload }.to change { user.nick }.to(new_values[:nick])
end
end
context 'when invalid' do
let(:new_values) { attributes_for(:invalid_user) }
it 'fails' do
expect(response).not_to be_success
end
it 'assigns user to @user' do
expect(assigns(:user)).to eq user
end
end
end
describe '#destroy' do
context 'when requested user exists' do
let(:user) { users[rand 4] }
before(:each) { delete :destroy, id: user.id }
it 'success' do
expect(response).to be_success
end
it 'removes user form DB' do
expect(User.all).not_to include user
expect { user.reload }.to raise_exception ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound
end
end
context 'when requested user does not exists' do
it 'throws ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound' do
expect { delete :destroy, id: -1 }.to raise_exception ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound
end
end
end
end
Here is controller, model and factory if you need them
-
\$\begingroup\$ looks pretty to good to me, but you could start by indenting with 2 spaces :) \$\endgroup\$tokland– tokland2014年03月26日 09:45:27 +00:00Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 9:45
-
\$\begingroup\$ @tokland Actually I use tabs (one tab for each level) I don't know why tabs ware converted to spaces \$\endgroup\$atomAltera– atomAltera2014年03月26日 09:50:39 +00:00Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 9:50
-
1\$\begingroup\$ @atomAltera They have to be spaces (and not tabs). But only 2 as tokland says \$\endgroup\$p.matsinopoulos– p.matsinopoulos2014年03月26日 10:57:41 +00:00Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 10:57
-
\$\begingroup\$ OK, you're right, code updated \$\endgroup\$atomAltera– atomAltera2014年03月27日 04:32:22 +00:00Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 4:32
1 Answer 1
It looks really good to me. All I have a very minor quibbles/suggestions.
Since you're using FactoryGirl, you should be able to use create_list :user, 4
instead of the 4.times.map { ... }
block
You might as well check that a new record be_kind_of User
. Just checking if it's an ActiveRecord is a little loose.
You don't need to create many users for some of these tests (like #show
and #destroy
). It's fine to do so of course, but the more tests you accumulate the faster you'll want your tests to be. And fully creating several records may be a bottleneck, especially for something like user models that likely have a uniqueness validation. That'll cause Rails to perform extra queries (one to check if the record is unique, and another to insert it in the DB).
Lastly, try running rspec with the --format documentation
option, if you're not already. It'll format the output like so
UsersController
#index
assigns all users to @users
success
#show
...
which I personally prefer because it reads well (and, as the name implies, documents stuff). But for that same reason, you may want to change success
to succeeds
and when valid
to something like with valid params
just so you get nicer sentences.
Again, this is all really minor stuff.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thank you very much! Can I ask you to help me with authorization/permissions testing? I can't find anything about it. Can you supply me some useful articles, or code samples? \$\endgroup\$atomAltera– atomAltera2014年03月31日 10:17:00 +00:00Commented Mar 31, 2014 at 10:17
-
1\$\begingroup\$ @atomAltera It really depends on how you've got it set up. If you're using Devise, there are some ready-made helpers. You can also use rspec stub/mock classes or methods to always return an admin user, or a
nil
user, or whatever, and see how stuff behaves. You'll also want to handle some of this in your higher-level feature specs. \$\endgroup\$Flambino– Flambino2014年03月31日 13:47:15 +00:00Commented Mar 31, 2014 at 13:47 -
\$\begingroup\$ how you look at such controller's testing fashion, this is just a draft, and it seems a little ugly, but I think you get an idea. I'm just trying DRYful style \$\endgroup\$atomAltera– atomAltera2014年04月24日 16:27:10 +00:00Commented Apr 24, 2014 at 16:27