I'm writing a small guessing game. I'm writing a points calculation algorithm.
I wrote the following, and it works. But I feel like I'm bringing over procedural background into Ruby, or not leveraging Ruby properly.
How would an experienced Ruby programmer approach the problem? You can test the code on TryRuby.com (copy and paste code in the browser interpreter).
# g = guesses
g = [{ id: 1, elmer: 5, roger: 7, outcome: "Roger Win" },{ id: 2, elmer: 5, roger: 1, outcome: "Elmer Win" },{ id: 3, elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }]
# r = actual results
r = [{ id: 1, elmer: 3, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" },{ id: 2, elmer: 7, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" },{ id: 3, elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }]
# points table
p = []
# rules: correct outcome = 1 point, perfect match = 5 points.
# Loop over results.
r.each do |result|
# Loop over guesses.
g.each do |guess|
# Make sure we compare corresponding ids.
# So, compare result 1 to guess 1, r2 to g2, etc....
if result[:id] == guess[:id]
# Init a hash to store score
score = {}
# Did they guess the correct outcome?
if result[:outcome] == guess[:outcome]
# Correct outcome guessed! Make a score hash, give'em a point.
score[:id] = result[:id] # game id
score[:points] = 1 # point
# Was it a perfect match?
if result[:elmer] == guess[:elmer] && result[:roger] == guess[:roger]
# Perfect match! Give them 4 points.
# They already got 1 point for guessing the correct outcome.
score[:points] += 4
end
end
# Add the score to the points table
p.push(score) unless score.empty?
end
end
end
3 Answers 3
I first propose how to improve your algorithm without changing the data structures.
Your algorithm is quadratic (two nested loops over all the entries). This can be easily avoided because you don't need to loop over all the g
array to find the item you need.
If they are not, sort the arrays by the id
key, using sort_by:
r.sort_by! { |e| e[:id] }
g.sort_by! { |e| e[:id] }
Then you can use each_with_index:
r.each_with_index { |result, i|
guess = g[i]
# compute the score here
}
or, if speed is not an issue (and this does not seem to be the case), you can also zip the arrays together r.zip(g)
and iterate on that:
r.zip(g).each { |result, guess|
# compute the score here
}
If you can modify the data structure I propose some alternatives.
Often when you have a set of objects with an id you use a hash.
# g = guesses
g = {1 => { elmer: 5, roger: 7, outcome: "Roger Win" }, 2 => {elmer: 5, roger: 1, outcome: "Elmer Win" }, 3 => { elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }}
# r = actual results
r = {1 => { elmer: 3, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" }, 2 => {elmer: 7, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" }, 3 => { elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }}
# points table
p = {}
# Loop over results.
r.each { |id, result|
guess = g[id]
# Init a hash to store score
score = {}
# compute the score here
# ...
p[id] = score unless score.empty?
}
If the id is a simple incremental integer and you add the entries in r
and g
in the same order, you can avoid the id at all and use the array indices instead:
# g = guesses
g = [{ elmer: 5, roger: 7, outcome: "Roger Win" }, {elmer: 5, roger: 1, outcome: "Elmer Win" }, { elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }]
# r = actual results
r = [{ elmer: 3, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" }, {elmer: 7, roger: 9, outcome: "Roger Win" }, { elmer: 4, roger: 8, outcome: "Roger Win" }]
# points table
p = {}
# Loop over results.
r.each_with_index { |result, id|
guess = g[id]
# Init a hash to store score
score = {}
# compute the score here
# ...
p[id] = score unless score.empty?
}
You can create a class to represent each entry of the array (let's call each entry a Match) and then implement the scoring algorithm as a method:
class Match
attr_accessor :elmer, :roger, :outcome
def initialize(elmer, roger, outcome)
@elmer = elmer
@roger = roger
@outcome = outcome
end
def compare(m)
score = 0
score = score + 1 if @outcome == m.outcome
score = score + 4 if @elmer == m.elmer and @roger == m.roger
score
end
end
Example usage:
guess = Match.new(5, 7, "Roger Win")
result = Match.new(3, 9, "Roger Win")
puts guess.compare(result) # => 1
guess = Match.new(5, 1, "Elmer Win")
result = Match.new(7, 9, "Roger Win")
puts guess.compare(result) # => 0
guess = Match.new(5, 7, "Roger Win")
result = Match.new(5, 7, "Roger Win")
puts guess.compare(result) # => 5
puts guess.compare(guess) # => 5
If the string argument just says who is the winner based on the numbers, you can compute it:
class Match
attr_accessor :elmer, :roger
def initialize(elmer, roger)
@elmer = elmer
@roger = roger
end
def outcome
if @elmer > @roger
:elmer
elsif @roger > @elmer
:roger
else
:tie
end
end
def compare(m)
if @elmer == m.elmer and @roger == m.roger
5
elsif outcome == m.outcome
1
else
0
end
end
end
Example usage:
guess = Match.new(5, 7)
result = Match.new(3, 9)
puts guess.compare(result) # => 1
guess = Match.new(5, 1)
result = Match.new(7, 9)
puts guess.compare(result) # => 0
guess = Match.new(5, 7)
result = Match.new(5, 7)
puts guess.compare(result) # => 5
puts guess.compare(guess) # => 5
guess = Match.new(2, 2)
result = Match.new(3, 3)
puts guess.compare(result) # => 1
guess = Match.new(2, 2)
result = Match.new(2, 2)
puts guess.compare(result) # => 5
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Wow. This is superb. I learnt so much from your answer. Thank you. \$\endgroup\$Jumbalaya Wanton– Jumbalaya Wanton2014年01月30日 10:11:16 +00:00Commented Jan 30, 2014 at 10:11
-
\$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure about the id. I'm going to use MongoDB to store the guesses. So they will all have an
id
, only the MongoDB id not numeric like RDBS, so it has no value for sorting. The other thing is, given I'm using a document database, I can just add the score to the guess document. \$\endgroup\$Jumbalaya Wanton– Jumbalaya Wanton2014年01月30日 11:17:43 +00:00Commented Jan 30, 2014 at 11:17 -
1\$\begingroup\$ Very good answer. Any reason to have
:outcome
, considering that it is easily determined from the score? \$\endgroup\$Cary Swoveland– Cary Swoveland2014年01月31日 07:03:28 +00:00Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 7:03 -
\$\begingroup\$ @CarySwoveland, I can't see any reason indeed. That's why I dropped it in the last example \$\endgroup\$Domenico De Felice– Domenico De Felice2014年01月31日 07:33:30 +00:00Commented Jan 31, 2014 at 7:33
-
1\$\begingroup\$ I missed that. In
compare()
, perhapsif @elmer == m.elmer && @roger == m.roger; 5; elsif outcome == m.outcome; 1; else; 0; end
. \$\endgroup\$Cary Swoveland– Cary Swoveland2014年02月01日 02:08:08 +00:00Commented Feb 1, 2014 at 2:08
Assuming your lists are already sorted by the ID and contain results/guesses for exactly the same ID you can do:
r.zip(g).each do |result, guess|
score = {}
#...
end
This dramatically reduces runtime from quadratic to linear time. If they are not already sorted, but contain exactly the same IDs you can do the following to sort them.
r.sort_by! {|e| e[:id]}
g.sort_by! {|e| e[:id]}
How does this look to you?
g.zip(r).collect do |guess, result|
points = (guess == result) ? 5 : guess[:outcome] == result[:outcome] ? 1 : 0
{:id => guess[:id], :points => points}
end
Note: This assumes g and r are sorted by :id; if not, you can sort prior to doing this =)
Also, I would define: FULL_SCORE = 5
and CORRECT_OUTCOME_SCORE = 1