This is a Python script that generates ngrams using a set of rules of what letters can follow a letter stored in a dictionary.
The output is then preliminarily processed using another script, then it will be filtered further using an api of sorts by number of words containing the ngrams, the result will be used in pseudoword generation.
This is the generation part:
from string import ascii_lowercase
import sys
LETTERS = set(ascii_lowercase)
VOWELS = set('aeiouy')
CONSONANTS = LETTERS - VOWELS
BASETAILS = {
'a': CONSONANTS,
'b': 'bjlr',
'c': 'chjklr',
'd': 'dgjw',
'e': CONSONANTS,
'f': 'fjlr',
'g': 'ghjlrw',
'h': '',
'i': CONSONANTS,
'j': '',
'k': 'hklrvw',
'l': 'l',
'm': 'cm',
'n': 'gn',
'o': CONSONANTS,
'p': 'fhlprst',
'q': '',
'r': 'hrw',
's': 'chjklmnpqstw',
't': 'hjrstw',
'u': CONSONANTS,
'v': 'lv',
'w': 'hr',
'x': 'h',
'y': 'sv',
'z': 'hlvw'
}
tails = dict()
for i in ascii_lowercase:
v = BASETAILS[i]
if type(v) == set:
v = ''.join(sorted(v))
tails.update({i: ''.join(sorted('aeiou' + v))})
def makechain(invar, target, depth=0):
depth += 1
if type(invar) == str:
invar = set(invar)
chain = invar.copy()
if depth == target:
return sorted(chain)
else:
for i in invar:
for j in tails[i[-1]]:
chain.add(i + j)
return makechain(chain, target, depth)
if __name__ == '__main__':
invar = sys.argv[1]
target = int(sys.argv[2])
if invar in globals():
invar = eval(invar)
print(*makechain(invar, target), sep='\n')
I want to ask about the makechain function, I used sets because somehow the results can contain duplicates if I used lists, though the result can be cast to set, I used a nested for loop and a recursive function to simulate a variable number of for loops.
For example, makechain(LETTERS, 4) is equivalent to:
chain = set()
for a in LETTERS:
chain.add(a)
for a in LETTERS:
for b in tails[a]:
chain.add(a + b)
for a in LETTERS:
for b in tails[a]:
for c in tails[b]:
chain.add(a + b + c)
for a in LETTERS:
for b in tails[a]:
for c in tails[b]:
for d in tails[c]:
chain.add(a + b + c + d)
Obviously makechain(LETTERS, 4) is much better than the nested for loop approach, it is much more flexible.
I want to know, is there anyway I can use a function from itertools instead of the nested for loop to generate the same results more efficiently?
I am thinking about itertools.product and itertools.combinations but I just can't figure out how to do it.
Any help will be appreciated.
2 Answers 2
Type checking
Don't do if type(var) == cls, instead do:
if isinstance(var, cls):
tails
This can be built via a dictionary comprehension rather than iterating over ascii_lowercase and looking up against BASETAILS every time:
tails = {
i: ''.join(sorted(VOWELS + v))
for i, v in BASETAILS.items()
}
makechain vs loops
Your n-depth loops are really just a cartesian product of LETTERS and tails, which can be accomplished, as you suspected, with itertools.product:
from itertools import product
def build_chain(letters, tails, depth, chain=None):
chain = chain if chain is not None else set()
if not depth - 1:
return chain.union(letters)
num_tails = [letters]
for _ in range(depth - 1):
chain.update(
''.join(c) for c in product(*num_tails)
)
last = its[-1]
num_tails.append(''.join(map(tails.get, last)))
return chain
Where this assumes that every entry in tails.values() is a string and letters is also a string
Any help will be appreciated
A few suggestions on something that I noticed:
In the function
makechaintheelseafter thereturnis not necessary.Typo in:
VOWELS = set('aeiouy'), there is an extray.This part:
LETTERS = set(ascii_lowercase) VOWELS = set('aeiou') CONSONANTS = LETTERS - VOWELS BASETAILS = { 'a': CONSONANTS, 'b': 'bjlr', 'c': 'chjklr', 'd': 'dgjw', .... } tails = dict() for i in ascii_lowercase: v = BASETAILS[i] if type(v) == set: v = ''.join(sorted(v)) tails.update({i: ''.join(sorted('aeiou' + v))})seems to do the following:
- Create a dictionary with mixed value's type (strings and sets)
- Convert all values to string
- Sort dictionary's values
It could be simplified to:
- Create a dictionary where all values are strings
- Sort dictionary's values
Additionally, having
VOWELSas a set andCONSONANTSas a string is a bit confusing. Would be better to use only one type.Code with suggestions above:
LETTERS = ascii_lowercase VOWELS = 'aeiou' CONSONANTS = ''.join(set(LETTERS) - set(VOWELS)) BASETAILS = { 'a': CONSONANTS, 'b': 'bjlr', 'c': 'chjklr', 'd': 'dgjw', .... } tails = dict() for i in ascii_lowercase: v = BASETAILS[i] tails.update({i: ''.join(sorted(VOWELS + v))})In this way, you also avoid sorting twice.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Correction, y in
'aeiouy'is not a typo, I know y isn't a full vowel, but it is a half-vowel, it acts as a vowel in many English words, such as many, cyber, psycho, dry... So it can be used as a vowel for pseudoword generation. \$\endgroup\$Ξένη Γήινος– Ξένη Γήινος2023年08月02日 15:40:07 +00:00Commented Aug 2, 2023 at 15:40
You must log in to answer this question.
Explore related questions
See similar questions with these tags.