This is the second iteration of this question
A note to start with: the first iteration of this question can be found here:
Editing system files in Linux (as root) with GUI and CLI text editors
As stated in there:
My intention is to POSIX-ly write one generalized function for running various text editors I use for different purposes through
sudoedit
, i.e. editing files as root safely. Safely = for instance, if a power loss occurs during the file edit; another example could be lost SSH connection, etc.
I come to you now with a possible final solution:
sudoedit
enhanced
# USAGE: Just source this file into your shell for instance if using Bash, then you can use these files: ~/.bashrc or ~/.bash_aliases
# Please, customize these lists to your preference before using this script!
sudoedit__cli_editor_list='nano vi'
sudoedit__gui_editor_list='gedit emacs xed subl' # VS Code has its own work-around
sudoedit_enhanced_run ()
# Generic function for text editing as root
# the proper, safe, way through `sudoedit`.
# Expected arguments:
# 1ドル = editor name; obviously mandatory
# 2ドル = wait option; to avoid this, pass an empty string ('')
# 3,ドル (4ドル), ... = file(s); at least one file must be given
{
# check the minimum number of arguments
if [ $# -lt 3 ]; then
printf '%b\n' "sudoedit_enhanced_run(): Low number of arguments.\\nExpected: \1ドル = editor name; \$2 = wait option; \3,ドル (\$4), ... = file(s).\\nPassed $#: $*" >&2
return 1
fi
# let's take a closer look at the first argument, the editor
editor_name=1ドル
# store an editor alias, if there is any
editor_alias=$( alias "$editor_name" 2> /dev/null )
# remove that alias for now
if [ -n "$editor_alias" ]; then
unalias "$editor_name"
fi
# find out if such editor exists on the system
# and store the first two arguments to variables
editor_path=$( command -v "$editor_name" 2> /dev/null )
wait_option=2ドル
# if that editor does not return valid path, print error and bail
if ! [ -x "$editor_path" ]; then
printf '%s\n' "sudoedit_enhanced_run(): This editor ('$editor_name') is not installed on this system." >&2
return 1
fi
# if we got here, then both of the things are ok;
# so let's move past the editor and its wait option to the actual files
shift 2
# check if all the files exist, it does not make sense to create a file this way
for file in "$@"; do
if ! [ -f "$file" ]; then
printf '%s\n' "sudoedit_enhanced_run(): This file ('$file') does not exist or it is not a regular file." >&2
return 1
fi
done
# run the editor with one-time SUDO_EDITOR set-up
SUDO_EDITOR="$editor_path $wait_option" sudoedit "$@"
# re-define the editor alias, if there was any, afterward
if [ -n "$editor_alias" ]; then
eval "$editor_alias"
fi
}
# Editor aliases generators / definitions
for cli_editor in $sudoedit__cli_editor_list; do
alias su$cli_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $cli_editor ''"
done
for gui_editor in $sudoedit__gui_editor_list; do
alias su$gui_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $gui_editor -w"
done
# VS Code specific workaround to work under root
alias sucode="sudo mkdir -p /root/.vscode && sudo code -w --user-data-dir=/root/.vscode"
Already posted on GitHub, whereas I also tried hard to describe the purpose and (in spite it shall be obvious) usage including some example images on the project GitHub page.
2 Answers 2
Self-review
comments
Comments are very important to future readers, they speed up the comprehension of the whole code. I think I messed up at least one comment, (others pending review):
original:
# let's take a closer look at the first argument, the editor
suggested:
# store the first argument, the editor name
combine what can be combined
By combining simple pieces of code, we make it easier to read.
original:
# store an editor alias, if there is any editor_alias=$( alias "$editor_name" 2> /dev/null ) # remove that alias for now if [ -n "$editor_alias" ]; then unalias "$editor_name" fi
suggested:
# store an editor alias; and if there is any, remove it for now if editor_alias=$( alias "$editor_name" 2> /dev/null ); then unalias "$editor_name" fi
implement code workaround into the function
My previous solution does not do any checks for code
and also, by doing this we get rid of that alien alias.
original:
# VS Code specific workaround to work under root alias sucode="sudo mkdir -p /root/.vscode && sudo code -w --user-data-dir=/root/.vscode"
suggested:
# run the editor with one-time SUDO_EDITOR set-up if [ "$editor_name" = code ]; then # code specific workaround sudo mkdir -p /root/.vscode && sudo code -w --user-data-dir=/root/.vscode "$@" else # main command generic SUDO_EDITOR="$editor_path $wait_option" sudoedit "$@" fi
avoid generating editors aliases for which editor is not installed
My previous solution is generating all editor aliases, no matter if such program is installed on the system, this could have been unpleasant to users.
original:
for cli_editor in $sudoedit__cli_editor_list; do alias su$cli_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $cli_editor ''" done for gui_editor in $sudoedit__gui_editor_list; do alias su$gui_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $gui_editor -w" done
suggested:
for cli_editor in $sudoedit__cli_editor_list; do if command -v "$cli_editor" > /dev/null 2>&1; then alias su$cli_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $cli_editor ''" fi done for gui_editor in $sudoedit__gui_editor_list; do if command -v "$gui_editor" > /dev/null 2>&1; then alias su$gui_editor="sudoedit_enhanced_run $gui_editor -w" fi done
This long line:
printf '%b\n' "sudoedit_enhanced_run(): Low number of arguments.\\nExpected: \1ドル = editor name; \$2 = wait option; \3,ドル (\$4), ... = file(s).\\nPassed $#: $*" >&2
can easily be made more tractable by separating the lines (since we have \n
in the format string) and by using single quotes where we don't want expansion (avoiding the need to write \$
):
# shellcheck disable=SC2016
printf '%s\n' >&2 \
'sudoedit_enhanced_run(): Low number of arguments.' \
'Expected: 1ドル = editor name; 2ドル = wait option; 3,ドル (4ドル), ... = file(s).' \
"Passed $#: $*"
-
\$\begingroup\$ It's not actually concatenating them: it's just re-using the same format string for 3 sets of arguments (only one in each set here, of course). It does look strange when you're used to C's
printf
, but it's really useful. I don't know of a specific name, though. \$\endgroup\$Toby Speight– Toby Speight2020年02月07日 09:26:56 +00:00Commented Feb 7, 2020 at 9:26