5
\$\begingroup\$

So I wrote a 2d rectangle class for use in a 2d pygame based game engine. It uses the vector class from this question, so if you want to test, you need that code too. I want to ask: Does this implementation has any huge downsides? Is the type hinting ok? Do I have any typos?

from numbers import Real
from typing import Sequence, Tuple
from vector import Vector, VectorType
RectType = Sequence[VectorType]
class Rect(RectType):
 def __len__(self) -> int:
 return 2
 def __getitem__(self, i: int) -> Vector:
 if i == 0:
 return self.pos1
 else:
 return self.pos2
 pos1: Vector
 pos2: Vector
 def __init__(self, pos1: VectorType, pos2: VectorType):
 x1, x2 = sorted((pos1[0], pos2[0]))
 y1, y2 = sorted((pos1[1], pos2[1]))
 self.pos1 = Vector(x1, y1)
 self.pos2 = Vector(x2, y2)
 def __repr__(self):
 return f"{self.__class__.__name__}{(self.pos1, self.pos2)}"
 @classmethod
 def from_xywh(cls, xy: VectorType, wh: VectorType):
 return Rect(Vector(xy), Vector(xy) + Vector(wh))
 def scale_wh(self, scale: VectorType) -> Rect:
 return Rect((self.pos1.x * scale[0], self.pos1.y * scale[1]), (self.pos2.x * scale[0], self.pos2.y * scale[1]))
 def collide_point(self, pos: VectorType):
 return self.pos1.x <= pos[0] <= self.pos2[1] and self.pos1.y <= pos[1] <= self.pos2.y
 def collide_rect(self, other: Rect):
 return any(self.collide_point(p) for p in (other.top_left, other.top_right, other.bottom_left, other.bottom_right)) or \
 any(other.collide_point(p) for p in (self.top_left, self.top_right, self.bottom_left, self.bottom_right))
 def relative_rect(self, parent: Rect) -> Rect:
 p1 = self.pos1 - parent.pos1
 p1 = Vector(p1.x / parent.w, p1.y / parent.h)
 p2 = self.pos2 - parent.pos1
 p2 = Vector(p2.x / parent.w, p2.y / parent.h)
 return self.__class__(p1, p2)
 def relative_point(self, point: VectorType) -> Vector:
 return (point - self.pos1) / self.wh
 @property
 def xywh(self):
 return self.left, self.top, self.width, self.height
 @property
 def width(self):
 return abs(self.pos1.x - self.pos2.x)
 w = width
 @property
 def height(self):
 return abs(self.pos1.y - self.pos2.y)
 h = height
 @property
 def size(self):
 return Vector(self.w, self.h)
 wh: Vector = size
 @property
 def left(self) -> float:
 return self.pos1.x
 @left.setter
 def left(self, value: float):
 self.pos1.x = value
 @property
 def right(self):
 return self.pos2.x
 @right.setter
 def right(self, value):
 self.pos2.x = value
 @property
 def top(self):
 return self.pos1.y
 @top.setter
 def top(self, value):
 self.pos1.y = value
 @property
 def bottom(self):
 return self.pos2.y
 @bottom.setter
 def bottom(self, value):
 self.pos2.y = value
 @property
 def top_left(self) -> Vector:
 return self.pos1
 @top_left.setter
 def top_left(self, value: Vector):
 self.pos1 = value
 xy: Vector = top_left
 @property
 def bottom_right(self) -> Vector:
 return self.pos2
 @bottom_right.setter
 def bottom_right(self, value: Vector):
 self.pos2 = value
 @property
 def top_right(self) -> Vector:
 return Vector(self.pos2.x, self.pos1.y)
 @top_right.setter
 def top_right(self, value: Vector):
 self.pos2.x, self.pos1.y = value
 @property
 def bottom_left(self) -> Vector:
 return Vector(self.pos1.x, self.pos2.y)
 @bottom_left.setter
 def bottom_left(self, value: VectorType):
 self.pos1.x, self.pos2.y = value
 @property
 def center(self) -> Vector:
 return Vector(self.pos1.x + self.w / 2, self.pos1.y + self.h / 2)
 @property
 def normalized(self):
 x1, x2 = sorted((self.pos1.x, self.pos2.x))
 y1, y2 = sorted((self.pos1.y, self.pos2.y))
 return Rect((x1, y1), (x2, y2))

Here is the code on github (with a few additions)

asked Apr 30, 2018 at 20:36
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Have you reviewed your code and tested it for typos yourself? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 30, 2018 at 20:44
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Hosch250 Yes, and I didn't find any. But maybe I just didn't look close enough. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 30, 2018 at 20:46

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$
return abs(self.pos1.x - self.pos2.x)

The abs is unnecessary since you've already sorted the coordinates.

I'm not sure using Vector for both absolute positions and relative sizes is the best practice. But in any event, you're missing the type hinting in

def size(self):

We also see a problem with:

@left.setter
 def left(self, value: float):
 self.pos1.x = value

in that it does not handle the case where the "left" is set to something greater than the right. It should either raise, or switch the coordinates. Similar with the other property setters.

answered May 1, 2018 at 0:30
\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ How would you go about solving the typehint problem for size? Create a Synonym for Vector, Size? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 1, 2018 at 9:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the accept, but on this website it's customary to wait 24-48 hours before accepting. Accepting send a signal "I'm satisfied with this answer and I don't want any others." You really ought to give multiple people a chance to comment. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 1, 2018 at 17:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok. If you don't want. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 1, 2018 at 17:22

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.