3
\$\begingroup\$

Continuing to work my way through some of of Project Euler. Problem 6 solved by my code below. Is it better to use sumOfTheSquares += i*i or utilize Math.Pow()?

The sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers is,
\1ドル^2 + 2^2 + ... + 10^2 = 385\$

The square of the sum of the first ten natural numbers is,
\$(1 + 2 + ... + 10)^2 = 55^2 = 3025\$

Hence the difference between the sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers and the square of the sum is 3025 ひく 385 = 2640.

Find the difference between the sum of the squares of the first one hundred natural numbers and the square of the sum.

class Program
{
 static void Main(string[] args)
 {
 Console.WriteLine(SumSquareDifference(100));
 Console.ReadLine();
 }
 static int SumSquareDifference(int upperValue)
 {
 int sumOfTheSquares = 0;
 for (int i = 1; i <= upperValue; i++)
 {
 sumOfTheSquares += (int)Math.Pow(i,2); //Can't formulate this myself...
 }
 int squareOfTheSums = (int)Math.Pow((upperValue + 1) * (upperValue / 2),2);
 return squareOfTheSums - sumOfTheSquares;
 }
}
vnp
58.5k4 gold badges55 silver badges144 bronze badges
asked May 12, 2017 at 4:20
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just one small question - why are you not reading the overview of problem that is provided after solving almost any task on projecteuler.net (including this one)? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2017 at 10:03

1 Answer 1

6
\$\begingroup\$

I don't know about the difference between sumOfTheSquares += i*i and Math.pow() but the sum of squared of first n natural numbers is as follows

\$ 1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 + 4^2 = \dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}\$

So its faster than using a for loop

Edit: General way to prove this is to use mathematical induction
Here's a link!

vnp
58.5k4 gold badges55 silver badges144 bronze badges
answered May 12, 2017 at 5:08
\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ Where can I find the derivation of this? I read through a few examples but was unable understand them. I was trying to come up with the generic solution but it kept eluding me. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2017 at 5:13
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ there is a write up of this on trans4mind.com/personal_development/mathematics/series/… \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2017 at 7:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ @IvenBach, Concrete Mathematics by Graham, Knuth and Patashnik discusses the general indefinite sum of "rising powers", from which the sum of simple powers can be obtained. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2017 at 8:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Please use \$\TeX\$ markup for math formulae. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 12, 2017 at 9:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AlanT Found that site and tried to go through it late at night, failed. Went through it today and makes sense. Had to step through it manually for it to make sense. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 13, 2017 at 0:56

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.