I have the following function using in my application:
applyFormSectionIdsToControls: function(formSections) {
if (!formSections.length) return;
var formSectionIds = [];
for (var i = 0, ii = formSections.length; i < ii; i++) {
formSectionIds.push(parseInt(formSections[i].id));
};
for (var i = 0, ii = formSections.length; i < ii; i++) {
var affectedWidgets = $.grep(application_widgets, function(item) {
return (($.inArray(item.widget_key, ['nextbutton', 'dropdown', 'radiobuttons']) >= 0) && (item.parent_id == formSections[i].id));
});
for (var j = 0, jj = affectedWidgets.length; j < jj; j++) {
if (affectedWidgets[j].widget_key == 'nextbutton' && (typeof affectedWidgets[j].settings.default_next_step != 'undefined' && affectedWidgets[j].settings.default_next_step > 0)) {
var _next_step = parseInt(affectedWidgets[j].settings.default_next_step);
if ($.inArray(_next_step, formSectionIds) == -1) {
affectedWidgets[j].settings.default_next_step = formSectionIds[_next_step - 1];
}
}
if (affectedWidgets[j].widget_key == 'radiobuttons' || affectedWidgets[j].widget_key == 'dropdown') {
for (var k = 0, kk = affectedWidgets[j].settings.answers; k < kk; k++) {
var _next_step = parseInt(affectedWidgets[k].settings.answers[k].next_step);
if ($.inArray(_next_step, formSectionIds) == -1) {
affectedWidgets[k].settings.answers[k].next_step = formSectionIds[_next_step - 1];
}
}
}
}
};
}
I'm looking for any hints how to refactor it, as I think there are too many for
loops.
1 Answer 1
Look, ma, no loops!
But seriously, if you were concerned about performance I don't think it's a problem of nested loops per se, $.grep
in the loop concerns me much more. Especially since you're doing basically the same grep
over and over!
After grep, neither item.parent_id
nor i
are used again. Looks like we can just cycle through all widgets in one $.grep
, and that's exactly what we're going to do.
Also, what you're doing with item.widget_key
begs for a switch
statement - or, at least, having those radiobutton
and dropdown
typed twice bugs me and begs for a well-placed typo to cause lots of frustration.
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you do with default_next_step
, so correctNextStep
probably needs some refinement (like, what if next_step - 1
is not a valid forum section index either?) but the code is supposed to work exactly the same as yours. (or not work, hard to say without test cases:D)
const inArray = (needle, haystack) => (-1 != haystack.indexOf(needle));
const parseIntIfDefined = (item) => ('undefined' === typeof(item) ? null : parseInt(item));
const applyFormSectionIdsToControls = function(formSections) {
if (!formSections.length) return;
const formSectionIds = formSections.map((section) => parseInt(section.id));
const correctNextStep = (nextStep) => {
if (inArray(nextStep, formSectionIds)) return nextStep;
return formSectionIds[nextStep - 1];
};
$.grep(application_widgets, (item) => {
if (!inArray(parseInt(item.parent_id), formSectionIds)) return;
switch (item.widget_key) {
case 'nextbutton':
const defaultNextStep = parseIntIfDefined(item.settings.default_next_step);
if (defaultNextStep) {
item.settings.default_next_step = correctNextStep(defaultNextStep);
}
break;
case 'radiobuttons':
case 'dropdown':
item.settings.answers.map(
(answer) => answer.next_step = correctNextStep(parseInt(answer.next_step))
);
break;
}
});
}
for
-loops ... sure there is some optimizations that I see, but ... \$\endgroup\$