I'm writing my first small programs in Haskell and still getting a feel for the syntax and idioms. I've written this Mad Libs implementation using recursive IO. I've used IO actions throughout and I'm sure there must be a better way of splitting up this code to separate pure functions from IO actions. Also, I'm not happy with the printf statement, but I couldn't find a native way to apply an arbitrary number of list items to printf.
import Text.Printf
getAnswer :: String -> IO String
getAnswer question = do
putStrLn question
answer <- getLine
return answer
getAnswers :: [String] -> [String] -> IO [String]
getAnswers [] ys = return ys
getAnswers (x:xs) ys = do
answer <- getAnswer x
let answers = ys ++ [answer]
getAnswers xs answers
main = do
let questions = ["Enter a noun:", "Enter a verb:", "Enter an adjective:", "Enter an adverb:"]
let madlib = "Your %s is %s up a %s mountain %s."
answers <- getAnswers questions []
printf madlib (answers!!0) (answers!!1) (answers!!2) (answers!!3)
putStrLn ""
1 Answer 1
Can we make getAnswer
simpler or out of IO
? Well, not really. You want to ask the use a question, and you want to get an answer. So all we could do is to reduce the amount of unnecessary code:
getAnswer :: String -> IO String
getAnswer question = putStrLn question >> getLine
-- or
-- = do
-- putStrLn question
-- getLine
However, getAnswers
can be refactored quite heavily. First of all, its interface isn't really developer-friendly. What are the questions? What are the answers? We should probably hide that in the bowels of our function:
getAnswers :: [String] -> IO [String]
getAnswers xs = go xs []
where go [] ys = return ys
go (x:xs) ys = do
answer <- getAnswer x
let answers = ys ++ [answer]
go xs answers
But ++ [...]
isn't really best-practice. Instead, you would ask all other questions and then combine them:
where go [] = return []
go (x:xs) = do
answer <- getAnswer x
otherAnswers <- getAnswers x
return (answer : otherAnswers)
But at that point, we're merily copying mapM
's functionailty. Therefore, your getAnswers
should be
getAnswers :: [String] -> IO [String]
getAnswers = mapM getAnswer
A lot simpler.
Now for your main
. If you don't know how many words you'll get you will need a list, correct. But lets check the structure of your result:
"Your %s is %s up a %s mountain %s."
1 2 3 4
There is a pattern. We have our text, then whatever the user gave us, then again our text, and so on. Let's split that into fragments:
["Your ","%s"," is ","%s"," up a ","%s"," mountain ","%s","."]
-- ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^
This brings up the following idea: if you have a list of your answers, you only need the list of the other words, right?
["Your "," is "," up a "," mountain ","."]
And then we need to "zip" that list with yours:
interleave :: [a] -> [a] -> [a]
interleave (x:xs) (y:ys) = x : y : interleave xs ys
interleave xs _ = xs
We end up with the following main
:
main = do
let questions = ["Enter a noun:", "Enter a verb:", "Enter an adjective:", "Enter an adverb:"]
let madlib = ["Your "," is "," up a "," mountain ","."]
answers <- getAnswers questions
putStrLn $ interleave madlib questions
Here's all the code at once:
getAnswer :: String -> IO String
getAnswer q = putStrLn q >> getLine
getAnswers :: [String] -> IO [String]
getAnswers = mapM getAnswer
interleave :: [a] -> [a] -> [a]
interleave (x:xs) (y:ys) = x : y : interleave xs ys
interleave xs _ = xs
main :: IO ()
main = do
let questions = ["Enter a noun:", "Enter a verb:", "Enter an adjective:", "Enter an adverb:"]
let madlib = ["Your "," is "," up a "," mountain ","."]
answers <- getAnswers questions
putStrLn $ interleave madlib questions
Exercises
The interleave
function above is left-biased. Why? Could this pose problems for your program? Why not?
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thanks for such an in depth review, it's given me a lot of good feedback. \$\endgroup\$Pappa– Pappa2016年11月11日 09:42:36 +00:00Commented Nov 11, 2016 at 9:42