#include<stdafx.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<string>
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
string temp[10];
void extract(char * c)
{
int ind = 0;
//char *temp = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char));
while(*c!= NULL)
{
if(*c!= ' ') // read all chars in a word and store in temp.
{
temp[ind]= temp[ind] + *c;
c++;
}
else if(*c== ' ') // reached end of word
{
c++;
ind++;
}
}
int length = sizeof(temp)/sizeof(temp[0]);
printf("The reversed string is");
for(int i=length;i>=0;i--)
{
cout<<temp[i];// not able to print it with printf statement
}
}
void main()
{
char *c = "seattle is good";
extract(c);
}
This should print the sentence in reverse order . Input is "seattle is good" Output for the above will be "good is seattle" I have 2 questions , 1. I am using string array here with size of 10. How can I make it dynamic? 2. For some reason the printf("%s",temp[i]) was not giving me correct results(At the very end of extract method). I then used cout and it was fine. Any ideas why? Am I doing something silly?
Algorithm Description:
- Take the input string as char array.
- Extract words from the string by looking for empty space.
- Store each word in a temp string array. temp[0] = seattle temp[1] = is temp[2] = good
- Then loop backwards through this temp array and print contents.
3 Answers 3
In response to your specific questions:
- Use a vector. Using a vector you can just append to the end and it will resize itself as necessary.
- You can not use
printf
withstring
s asprintf
is a C function and does not know C++'sstring
s. Either way you should generally avoidprintf
in C++ code.
General notes on your code:
#include<stdafx.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
The correct way to include C header files in C++ is to use #include <cheadername>
, not #include <headername.h>
. Further you should avoid C-functions when there are good C++ alternatives and you should generally not mix C's stdio with C++'s iostream. In this particular program I do not believe you need any of the C headers you include.
string temp[10];
I don't see any reason to have your global storage as a global variable. You should move it as a local variable inside the extract
method. And as I already said, you should use a vector
instead of a C array.
Also temp
is a bad variable name.
void extract(char * c)
Don't mix char*
s and string
s unless necessary. In this case you can use string
s all the way, so you should define extract
with const string& sentence
as an argument (note that sentence
is also a more descriptive name than c
).
Further it seems that your extract
function is doing too much work: it's extracting words from the sentence into an array, and then printing it in reverse. These two separate steps should be done by two functions: extract
(or maybe sentence_to_words
which is more descriptive) and print_in_reverse
.
You might even want to use 3 steps instead: extract the words, reverse them, then print them. This way your IO code is completely separate from any logic, which is always good. As a bonus point C++ already has a built-in function to reverse an array or vector, so no additional work for you.
Either way you'd need to change your extract
function to either return the extracted words rather than void
or take a vector into which to store the extracted words as an argument (by reference).
//char *temp = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char));
This code is commented out anyway (and doesn't do anything sensible from the looks of it), but as a general principle I want to point out that there's rarely a reason to use malloc
over new
in C++.
int ind = 0;
while(*c!= NULL)
{
if(*c!= ' ') // read all chars in a word and store in temp.
{
temp[ind]= temp[ind] + *c;
c++;
}
else if(*c== ' ') // reached end of word
{
c++;
ind++;
}
}
Using a vector you can get rid of ind
as you can just push_back
into the vector.
Further if you use string
s, you can simplify this part by using find
to find the next space and substr
take the substring up to that space.
int length = sizeof(temp)/sizeof(temp[0]);
Note that this will only ever tell you the size of an array if the array's size is known at compile time (which is more or less equivalent to: "spelled out in the code"). So if you want the size of the array to be dynamic, you can't use this. If you use a vector, you can just use temp.size()
.
printf("The reversed string is");
As I already said, you shouldn't mix stdio
and iostream
. There is no reason to use printf
here.
void main()
The correct return value for main
is int
, not void
.
char *c = "seattle is good";
Again this should just be string sentence("seattle is good");
. No reason to use char*
.
If I were to write this program, I might do it like this:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
using std::string;
using std::vector;
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
using std::reverse;
// Splits a sentence by spaces into a vector of words
void extract(const string& sentence, vector<string>& words)
{
size_t pos = 0;
while(pos != string::npos)
{
// Find position of next space
int next_space = sentence.find(" ", pos);
// Store everything up to next space in the words vector
words.push_back( sentence.substr(pos, next_space - pos));
// Continue at the next character which is not a space.
pos = sentence.find_first_not_of(" ", next_space);
}
}
// Prints the strings in the vector separated by spaces
void print_strings(const vector<string>& strings)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < strings.size(); i++) {
cout << strings[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
int main()
{
string sentence("seattle is good");
vector<string> words;
extract(sentence, words);
reverse(words.begin(), words.end());
print_strings(words);
}
-
\$\begingroup\$ Am trying to see if it is possible to do the same without the temp variable. I wanted to try a inplace replacement and I have this algorithm in mind. Algorithm: 1. Keep a start and end index. Start will be 0 and end will be length of the input string - 1. \$\endgroup\$user2533– user25332011年03月12日 00:24:04 +00:00Commented Mar 12, 2011 at 0:24
-
\$\begingroup\$ Actually, it should be
string sentence("seattle is good");
No point in having it constructed and then assigning to it :) \$\endgroup\$Mark Loeser– Mark Loeser2011年03月12日 16:09:31 +00:00Commented Mar 12, 2011 at 16:09 -
\$\begingroup\$ FWIW,
stdafx.h
is not even a C header. \$\endgroup\$L. F.– L. F.2019年07月28日 04:00:15 +00:00Commented Jul 28, 2019 at 4:00
An alternate iterative solution is as follows. This might not be much of an improvement over the more imperative approach above, still a different algorithm might be good to learn.
A simple function that prints out a word that starts from the current character pointer. We loop and print till we get a end-of-string ('0円') or a blank:
#include <iostream>
void print_word(const char* x) {
while (*x != ' ' && *x != '0円'){
std::cout << x[0];
x++;
}
std::cout << " ";
}
The chief function, that operates from the first letter of a word:
void iterate_words(const char* x) {
We remember where this word has started at pointer x.
const char *a = x;
We start looking for the start position of the next word (or rest of the sentence). And yes, if the string ends in the meantime, we don't need that position. We just set a flag lastword
and exit.
bool islastword = 0;
while (*a != ' ') {
if (*a == '0円') {
islastword = 1;
break;
}
a++;
}
Now, we have the position of our current word and rest of the sentence. If we print this word, and then call up our function iterate_words
over rest of the sentence, we shall print the sentence in its original form. But, if we do the function call first, then only after the next word has been printed shall we print the current word, i.e. in reverse!
if (!lastword) iterate_words(a + 1);
print_word(x);
}
int main()
{
iterate_words("hello world");
return 0;
}
why char ? use string ,use stack or vector to push contents of the word after that read it in reverse order
#include<vector>
std::string word ="i dont know what to do";
std::<vector> temp;
for(size_t i=0;i<=word.length();i++)
{
temp.push_back(word[i]);
}
//for getting in reverse order
for(size_t j=word.length();j<=0;j--)
std::cout<<temp[j];