For practice in Python OOP (first time) and for some relaxation from trying to learn Serialization in Java, I decided to write a LinkedList in Python. Now, this class would be pretty useless, because in Python, instead of:
(Java)
int[] array = new int[size];
// initialization...
// Now add an object to the end
int[] newArray = Arrays.copyOf(array, size + 1);
newArray[size] = value; // Really annoying, is it not?
You can do:
array = [] # And other values
array.append(value)
When you want to add a value. But, since it's for practice, it's not for use.
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.first = None
self.last = None
self.size = 0
def add(self, value):
'''
Adds the specified element to the end of the array.
'''
if not self.first: # first is None
self.first = Node(None, None, value)
self.last = self.first
else:
node = Node(self.last, None, value)
self.last.after = node
self.last = node
self.size += 1
def add_at(self, value, index):
'''
Adds the specified element at the specified position.
If the given index is out of range of the list, the
element is added to the end.
'''
if index >= self.size:
self.add(value)
if index == 0:
new = Node(None, self.first, value)
self.first.before = new
self.first = new
node = self.get_node(index)
new = Node(node, node.after, value)
node.after.before = node
node.after = new
self.size += 1
def remove(self, index):
'''
Removes the specified element at the specified position.
If the given index is out of range of the list, an
IndexError is thrown.
'''
node = self.get_node(index)
node.before.after = node.after
node.after.before = node.before
return node.value
def get(self, index):
'''
Returns the specified element at the specified position.
If the given index is out of range of the list, an
IndexError is thrown.
'''
return self.get_node(index).value
def get_node(self, index):
'''
Returns the specified node at the specified position.
If the given index is out of range of the list, an
IndexError is thrown.
'''
if index >= self.size:
raise IndexError()
node = None
if index > self.size / 2:
# From back
node = self.last
for i in range(index, self.size - 1):
node = node.before
else:
# From front
node = self.first
for i in range(1, index):
node = node.after
return node
class Node:
def __init__(self, before, after, value):
self.before = before
self.after = after
self.value = value
Concerns:
- I think I can separate Python from Java anc C++ now, so the
;
is no longer there. But just in case, is there a stray;
? - Is the way this class is constructed Pythonic?
- Are the docstrings good?
1 Answer 1
Methods & Naming
You're building a collection so, implicitly, you're building a contract with your user that your class will act like a collection, that you'll stick to a protocol for collections objects.
If you wan't to grasp a little more on what I’m trying to say, you can read this article.
So, even though I agree with @Dair that size
would be "saffer" as _size
(but hey, we’re all responsible adults around here), I strongly disagree with the size
property. You should implement it as a __len__
method and use it like:
stuff = LinkedList()
length = len(stuff)
Some other methods can have more common names too:
add
\$->\$apppend
;add_at
\$->\$insert
or__setitem__
:__setitem__
will allow you to dostuff[3] = 'some value'
and theninsert
is just a call toself[index] = value
.You will need to change the signature to
def __setitem__(self, key, value)
.remove
\$->\$pop
(or maybe__delitem__
);remove
is prefered to remove by value instead of by index.get
\$->\$__getitem__
: it will allow you to dothe_value = stuff[3]
; you should also removeget_node
as there is little to no interest in exposing your internals to the user.
Methods that are missing
You could implement an __iter__
method that will allow you to do:
stuff = LinkedList()
# populate stuff
for elem in stuff: # will use __iter__, or fail back to __len__ + __getitem__ if not available
do_something(elem)
It will also help you shorten __getitem__
. You can use something along the lines of:
def __iter__(self):
node = self.first
while node is not None: # No self.size involved, yay
yield node.value
node = node.after
You can also implement the __reversed__
iterator using the same logic (and use it in __getitem__
too.
Using a parameter to __init__
that default to None
would also be usefull to build a LinkedList
out of any iterable:
def __init__(self, other=None):
self._size = 0
self.first = None
self.last = None
if other is not None:
for element in other:
self.append(element)
It is then easy to create stuff = LinkedList([1,2,8,12])
.
And finally, you should consider adding a __str__
or __repr__
method so you can print(stuff)
. Use __iter__
to simplify it.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Great answer, I didn't know about all the built-in names. Is there some documentation with a complete list? \$\endgroup\$Blue– Blue2015年12月24日 14:28:49 +00:00Commented Dec 24, 2015 at 14:28
-
\$\begingroup\$ For "magic methods" names, have a look at this section of the docs. For the other ones such as
insert
orappend
,help([])
in an interactive session might come in handy. \$\endgroup\$301_Moved_Permanently– 301_Moved_Permanently2015年12月24日 17:24:22 +00:00Commented Dec 24, 2015 at 17:24