4
\$\begingroup\$

This question is a follow-up to Create a reference for newbie common mistakes.

I'm trying to understand/outline how these language references should look like.

What do you think should be put in them, and what not?

Edit: I'm not trying to adress specific things to put in them, but a general guideline to follow, so who want to partecipate can come here, see what we agreed on to build and jump along with us :)

As of right now we're just trying to start with the right foot, I agree that for sure we'll see later what works and what not (and maybe come back here to talk about it).

asked Mar 18, 2012 at 18:47
\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$

I think the best way to flush out what should go in and what shouldn't is to take it on a per-example basis. Start out with 1 question using generic phrasing for some language, like:

What are some common ways to improve Python code? One example per answer, please.

As answers are posted, the community can re-evaluate the scope of the question and make changes as necessary. Perhaps this question can be updated with the accepted phrasing, and then anyone can use it to create a new reference for a specific language.

answered Mar 20, 2012 at 17:48
\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think that's the best way indeed. The Area51 way, which also worked well to refine the scope of CodeReview. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 21, 2012 at 8:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree that that is the best way, I was trying to build some common ground for the very start and maybe a place where to come back later once we'll have clear ideas. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 21, 2012 at 8:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm not saying that we should spend much time at this stage, but a little should not bring any harm (imho), like a little design session before coding. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 21, 2012 at 8:59
1
\$\begingroup\$

I think these language references should be addressed to newbies.

Intermediate and advanced levels could be wrote later:

  • It's best to start with simple things.
  • Maybe we'll never even need them, we'll see how this newbie goes.
  • If goes well, well these levels should be in a separate "session" anyway.

I'd say that we should try do adress those newbie's common mistakes that we so often see here on code review.

I think that we should not build a duplicate of the official doc or some kind of tutorial.

This is something different, something that newbies will read after having already written a working piece of code. That said I think that linking to the official doc is good, providing an official reference is always a good thing.

answered Mar 21, 2012 at 8:40
\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.