\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
1
I came across this self-answer today:
https://codereview.stackexchange.com/a/10844/46800
It had no explanation or evaluation of the code in question, just a code rewrite. This seems to me to not really achieve the purpose of this SE site in the first place, however it has been upvoted 3 times. Are these answers acceptable?
... Just realised the original question is 2 years old. My question still stands, though.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Related: meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/1463/… \$\endgroup\$rolfl– rolfl Mod2014年06月22日 20:23:30 +00:00Commented Jun 22, 2014 at 20:23
1 Answer 1
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
No, answers that just contain code are not acceptable, even if it is a self-answer. I have added a notice calling for an explanation.
Related posts:
answered Jun 22, 2014 at 20:24
You must log in to answer this question.
Explore related questions
See similar questions with these tags.