In order to automatically check for doubtful words in .xdc-s.
Political statements getting silently part of a Webxdc-s can confuse people about Delta Chat.
It is needlessly if the statement itself does not change how app itself behaves.
WORD_LIST checker for .xdc-s #258
Closed
sbkaf
wants to merge 1 commit from
sbkaf/xdcget:main into main
pull from: sbkaf/xdcget:main
merge into: webxdc:main
webxdc:main
webxdc:experintellia/add-tools
webxdc:fix-no-author-name
webxdc:wofwca-patch-1
webxdc:adb/update-arcanecircle-apps
webxdc:septias-patch-1
webxdc:adb/add-pixelit-update-ruffle
webxdc:adb/fix-tcm-category
webxdc:hpk/remove-lock
webxdc:hpk/fix-ci
webxdc:adb/update-super-castle
webxdc:hpk/simplify-3-storage
webxdc:adb/issue-56
webxdc:adb/add-gitea-support
webxdc:adb/code-tweaks
webxdc:adb/issue-62
webxdc:hpk/better_checks
webxdc:adb/use-env-vars
webxdc:adb/issue-22
webxdc:hpk/export-zip
sbkaf
commented 2025年09月04日 20:13:03 +02:00
In order to automatically check for doubtful words in .xdc-s.
Political statements getting silently part of a Webxdc-s can confuse people about Delta Chat.
It is needlessly if the statement itself does not change how app itself behaves.
hpk
commented 2025年09月30日 12:10:13 +02:00
i doubt an automated scanning solution is very useful, when we
a) haven't fully established the ground rules for publishing in webxdc-store
b) don't have an even small group of regular maintainers to consistently react to submissions
IOW, i agree we want to refine and review what gets published or rejected but a PR that bans a single word is not very helpful for that clarification process. Note that in the Dresden talk mentioning the webxdc store , the store was framed as a "chaos soup" :)
i doubt an automated scanning solution is very useful, when we
a) haven't fully established the ground rules for publishing in webxdc-store
b) don't have an even small group of regular maintainers to consistently react to submissions
IOW, i agree we want to refine and review what gets published or rejected but a PR that bans a single word is not very helpful for that clarification process. Note that in the [Dresden talk mentioning the webxdc store ](https://media.ccc.de/v/ds25-603-usable-end-to-end-security-with-delta-chat-and-chatmail#t=2208), the store was framed as a "chaos soup" :)
sbkaf
force-pushed main from 2025年12月02日 18:20:56 +01:00
Compare
ac29a50a15
to d768f49560
sbkaf
closed this pull request 2025年12月02日 18:23:14 +01:00
Pull request closed
Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
contribution welcome
Contributions are very welcome, get started here
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
good first issue
Interested in contributing? Get started here.
help wanted
Need some help
invalid
Something is wrong
question
More information is needed
upstream
Related to an upstream repository, already reported there
No labels
bug
contribution welcome
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
upstream
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
webxdc/xdcget!258
Loading...
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "sbkaf/xdcget:main"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?