librewolf/gentoo
15
36
Fork
You've already forked gentoo
7

docs: Update README.md #75

Merged
TheGreatMcPain merged 2 commits from :docs into master 2026年04月19日 07:55:44 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

Just small README.md updates.

Just small README.md updates.
README.md Outdated
@ -25,3 +25,3 @@
```bash
sudo eselect repository add librewolf git https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo.git
doas eselect repository add librewolf git https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo.git
Contributor
Copy link

I don't see a reason to replace sudo with doas in this example.

I believe sudo is what most people use, so changing it to a more obscure tool seems counter-intuitive.

Anyways, if someone's using doas, they'll just modify the command.

I don't see a reason to replace `sudo` with `doas` in this example. I believe `sudo` is what most people use, so changing it to a more obscure tool seems counter-intuitive. Anyways, if someone's using `doas`, they'll just modify the command.
Contributor
Copy link

Technically, an alternative would be to write the following:

# eselect repository add librewolf git https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo.git

where # would indicate a root shell.

Technically, an alternative would be to write the following: ```console # eselect repository add librewolf git https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo.git ``` where `#` would indicate a root shell.
doasu requested changes 2026年04月18日 20:49:14 +02:00
Dismissed
doasu left a comment
Copy link

If I may make a minor suggestion - I would reconsider using doas in

Line 27 in 509bd6f
doas eselect repository add librewolf git https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo.git

(See: #75 (comment))

but otherwise I'm for it :)

If I may make a minor suggestion - I would reconsider using `doas` in https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo/src/commit/509bd6faeebf180cdeb6a3ae25554e42dea1b747/README.md?display=source#L27 (See: https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo/pulls/75#issuecomment-13302507) but otherwise I'm for it :)
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Anyway, from what I have seen of Gentoo users, roughly one out of every two or three uses doas, especially considering that Gentoo itself assumes a certain level of system administration experience.

Anyway, from what I have seen of Gentoo users, roughly one out of every two or three uses `doas`, especially considering that Gentoo itself assumes a certain level of system administration experience.

Looks good to me.

To chime in on doas/sudo. Not sure about other Gentoo users, but it's very rare that I'll use something like doas, or sudo. I only use those when I have to restart a service, make a small edit to a file in /etc, test ebuilds, etc.

Most of the time if I'm updating my system, or doing anything that requires a lot of commands that require root, I'll just login as root via sudo su -.

Looks good to me. To chime in on `doas/sudo`. Not sure about other Gentoo users, but it's very rare that I'll use something like `doas`, or `sudo`. I only use those when I have to restart a service, make a small edit to a file in `/etc`, test ebuilds, etc. Most of the time if I'm updating my system, or doing anything that requires a lot of commands that require `root`, I'll just login as `root` via `sudo su -`.
Contributor
Copy link

Sorry for off-topic but I have to ask:

@TheGreatMcPain wrote in #75 (comment):

[...] I'll just login as root via sudo su -.

Are you aware that sudo -i exists, which does the exact same thing (spawns an interactive root shell), but doesn't depend on su? :p

Sorry for off-topic but I have to ask: @TheGreatMcPain wrote in https://codeberg.org/librewolf/gentoo/pulls/75#issuecomment-13339704: > [...] I'll just login as `root` via `sudo su -`. Are you aware that `sudo -i` exists, which does the exact same thing (spawns an interactive root shell), but doesn't depend on `su`? :p
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
librewolf/gentoo!75
Reference in a new issue
librewolf/gentoo
No description provided.
Delete branch ":docs"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?