Jan-Willem Harmannij jwharm · he/him
jwharm pushed to main at jwharm/tribute-to-paganitzu 2026年07月12日 17:45:01 +02:00
7b36571a76 Miscellanious fixes and improvements
602768dc74 Fix spacing in headerbar
c4e37a3f63 Rename position.move()
9a8bcc027e Nullability fixes, ui code improvements, and some small fixes
44e0cb546c Update version, copyright years, code style
Compare 6 commits »
jwharm deleted branch global-exception-handler from java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月12日 17:11:37 +02:00
jwharm pushed to main at java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月12日 17:11:37 +02:00
3c4d053e36 Merge pull request 'Add support for a user-defined global exception handler' (#382) from global-exception-handler into main
a70da1da2a Add support for a user-defined exception handler
Compare 2 commits »
jwharm merged pull request java-gi/java-gi#382 2026年07月12日 17:11:36 +02:00
Add support for a user-defined global exception handler
jwharm created pull request java-gi/java-gi#382 2026年07月12日 17:11:24 +02:00
Add support for a user-defined global exception handler
jwharm pushed to global-exception-handler at java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月12日 17:09:13 +02:00
a70da1da2a Add support for a user-defined exception handler
jwharm created branch global-exception-handler in java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月12日 17:09:13 +02:00
jwharm commented on issue java-gi/java-gi#381 2026年07月12日 17:01:48 +02:00
Java exceptions on gtk callbacks

Installing a global exception handler to handle this is still a good idea though. (In very specific circumstances, the exception propagation introduced with RC2 doesn't work.) So thanks for the...

jwharm commented on issue java-gi/java-gi#381 2026年07月11日 19:19:49 +02:00
Java exceptions on gtk callbacks

Are you using release 1.0.0-RC2?

jwharm commented on issue java-gi/java-gi#379 2026年07月11日 19:13:40 +02:00
[Gst] Possible issue with memory layout?

I've released a snapshot so you can test if it works.

jwharm commented on issue java-gi/java-gi#379 2026年07月11日 18:58:40 +02:00
[Gst] Possible issue with memory layout?

You can revert to the behavior of 1.0.0-RC1 by setting the environment variable java-gi.discard-callback-exceptions tottrue. However, this doesn't solve the rootcause: The call to `Message.read...

jwharm deleted branch union-fields from java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月11日 18:55:53 +02:00
jwharm pushed to main at java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月11日 18:55:52 +02:00
66243077cf Merge pull request 'Fix handling memory layouts with union components' (#380) from union-fields into main
6e239dc6c5 Fix handling memory layouts with union components
Compare 2 commits »
jwharm closed issue java-gi/java-gi#379 2026年07月11日 18:55:51 +02:00
[Gst] Possible issue with memory layout?
jwharm merged pull request java-gi/java-gi#380 2026年07月11日 18:55:51 +02:00
Fix handling memory layouts with union components
jwharm created pull request java-gi/java-gi#380 2026年07月11日 18:55:39 +02:00
Fix handling memory layouts with union components
jwharm pushed to union-fields at java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月11日 18:53:04 +02:00
6e239dc6c5 Fix handling memory layouts with union components
jwharm created branch union-fields in java-gi/java-gi 2026年07月11日 18:53:04 +02:00
jwharm commented on issue java-gi/java-gi#379 2026年07月11日 16:57:00 +02:00
[Gst] Possible issue with memory layout?

This is a bug with reading/writing fields of a union type (in this case it's the Mutex). The issue must have been introduced with the rewrite of the memorylayout generator in RC1. I'm pretty...

jwharm pushed to main at java-gi/examples 2026年07月06日 09:43:24 +02:00
acee9656e9 Add AppLauncher example