Iterate on draft blog post (monthly update feb 2023) #175

Hm, I change it to „ally" now. That term is used in the inclusive community (CC @fsologureng). Usually for people with privileges that side with minority groups.

I'm open for suggestions.

I would use: We have taken special care to make these links accessible".

I am not comfortable using "ally" because it is not what I would expect from all readers of this website. The readership is usually larger than those involved in the development or use of the software.

Done.

I was referring to forgejo/meta#159

So . we need an issue for that to legitimise it?
I'm still not up-to-date with our processes :(

I see what you mean. My idea was that a disbanded moderation team could be interpreted at no moderation happening at all. And that the Forgejo community would be fine with it. That's not what should come across.

Rephrased.

I'd like to have another pair on eyes on this.
No offense, but I feel like you are to emotionally involved in this.

(redacted)

this message was redacted by the moderation team, if you would like to know more please write to moderation@forgejo.org

I thought long and hard about what to do here.
As you can guess, there were additional comments in between. The respective authors have chosen to delete them. I will respect their decision.

That being said, I value the conversation here as a public record. Therefore I am not going to update mine. I also encourage you to look at the commits to understand how the section in question developed over time.

Right. The update happened on March 1st.
Off-by-one.

https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted/pull/3467

Removed.

I see what you mean.

My intention to have some kind of „conclusion" as I am used to it in a blog post format.

As such I was hoping to not end on a bad note.

Then the grants are not finalised (except yours for F3 MoU in March). So it has a future aspect to it.

@crystal and @earl-warren I pushed an update here on this section.
Would like to get your opinion on whether I got the details right.
Remember that I want to refer to the state of February.

Thanks in advance!

I did not mention it (since it didn't show up in our funding/sustainability repo).
But that's the first accepted grant of this year that I'm aware of.

s/Our/The/

"Our grant" mean that, in the future, the Forgejo community will be held accountable for how the grant was executed. But the beneficiaries of each grant application are specific groups of individuals / organizations. Forgejo, as a community (us, our) is not a beneficiary of these grants, has no control over them or their implementation.

There is one grant application for which you are the beneficiary and you alone decide what it is and how it relates to Forgejo. There is another grant application for which beneficiaries are yet to be determined, probably @crystal and @earl-warren. I wrote it, sent the application and passed the first hurdle, but I'm not a beneficiary.

Pfft, details 😹

Fixed.