Archived
15
23
Fork
You've already forked meta
6

Transition guide moving from Gitea to Forgejo #69

Open
opened 2022年12月17日 08:50:05 +01:00 by circlebuilder · 4 comments
Contributor
Copy link

Mentioned in chat there are questions about transitioning from Gitea to Forgejo and in follow-up mention of offering a transition guide for people to go through this process. Sounds like a good idea to have this as a separate piece of documentation.

[Mentioned in chat](https://matrix.to/#/!qjPHwFPdxhpLkXMkyP:matrix.org/$_FLCYrKPSNwaZn0cdRzivIYC0wfacOfEVKN778Fie_8?via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de&via=exozy.me) there are questions about transitioning from Gitea to Forgejo and in follow-up mention of offering a transition guide for people to go through this process. Sounds like a good idea to have this as a separate piece of documentation.

Yeah, definitely...

  • Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation? Any known problems or is it like any other Gitea update before?
  • Manual preparation needed?
  • What about the Rebranding that has been done partly, can this lead to problems in the future?
Yeah, definitely... - Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation? Any known problems or is it like any other Gitea update before? - Manual preparation needed? - What about the Rebranding that has been done partly, can this lead to problems in the future?
Member
Copy link

Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation?

I did.

Any known problems

None.

is it like any other Gitea update before?

Yes.

Manual preparation needed?

No.

Actually, I've read on some Forgejo documentation that some versions or circumstances may require additional preparation steps, but personally I never did, on any Forgejo/Gitea version ever.

> Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation? [I did.](https://git.kaki87.net) > Any known problems None. > is it like any other Gitea update before? Yes. > Manual preparation needed? No. Actually, I've read on some Forgejo documentation that some versions or circumstances may require additional preparation steps, but personally I never did, on any Forgejo/Gitea version ever.

Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation?

I did too

Any known problems

Nope.

Is it like any other Gitea update before?

Yes.

Manual preparation needed?

Not needed. I had Gitea set up with systemd and most of the related directories, files, and services were named gitea. It works fine just leaving it like this, but I went ahead and renamed everything to forgejo, leaving behind symlinks to avoid breaking anything that I forgot to update.

> Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation? [I did too](https://sc.cryxtal.org/) > Any known problems Nope. > Is it like any other Gitea update before? Yes. > Manual preparation needed? Not _needed_. I had Gitea set up with systemd and most of the related directories, files, and services were named `gitea`. It works fine just leaving it like this, but I went ahead and renamed everything to `forgejo`, leaving behind symlinks to avoid breaking anything that I forgot to update.
Contributor
Copy link
  • Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation?

I did.

Any known problems or is it like any other Gitea update before?

Yes.

  • Manual preparation needed?

Some aftermath. I had to put the forgejo binary (preferably without version number) next to the gitea one and adjust git hooks. Otherwise I will receive a rejection on pushes, because I deleted the gitea binary after the migration and it can't find the correct path.

I also wrote a new supervisord configuration for Forgejo (by now there is an instruction in the community curated Lab space of Uberspace).

  • What about the Rebranding that has been done partly, can this lead to problems in the future?

Not in my observation yet.

> - Who has done an Forgejo update to a Gitea Installation? [I did](https://code.jaenis.ch). > Any known problems or is it like any other Gitea update before? Yes. > - Manual preparation needed? Some aftermath. I had to put the forgejo binary (preferably without version number) next to the gitea one and adjust git hooks. Otherwise I will receive a rejection on pushes, because I deleted the gitea binary after the migration and it can't find the correct path. I also wrote a new supervisord configuration for Forgejo (by now there is an instruction in the community curated Lab space of Uberspace). > - What about the Rebranding that has been done partly, can this lead to problems in the future? Not in my observation yet.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No Branch/Tag specified
readme
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
[Decision] Building proposal(s)
We're in a decision-making process, buiding one or more proposals to address the shared aim based on the criteria
[Decision] Gathering criteria
We're in a decision-making process, gathering criteria, considerations and needs
[Decision] Integrating concerns
We're in a decision-making process, working with a proposal, trying to integrate concerns and create modifications/support such that the proposal works for everyone
Accessibility
Relates to Accessibility (a11y) of product, project and process.
Agreement proposal
Forgejo agreement proposal, following a discussion
Communication
Relates to all channels, social media, website, blog posts.
Election
Process of appointing a person into a role or team (if choosing people just for a specific one-time task, use the Entrustment label)
Entrustment
Process of choosing/approving specific people to do a critical/high-impact one-time task (if choosing people for an ongoing role/team, use the Election label)
Governance
Relates to processes, procedures and decision-making.
Meeting
An upcoming team meeting
User research - Accessibility
Requires input about accessibility features, likely involves user testing.
User research - Blocked
Do not pick as-is! We are happy if you can help, but please coordinate with ongoing redesign in this area.
User research - Community
Community features, such as discovering other people's work or otherwise feeling welcome on a Forgejo instance.
User research - Config (instance)
Instance-wide configuration, authentication and other admin-only needs.
User research - Errors
How to deal with errors in the application and write helpful error messages.
User research - Filters
How filter and search is being worked with.
User research - Future backlog
The issue might be inspiring for future design work.
User research - Git workflow
AGit, fork-based and new Git workflow, PR creation etc
User research - Labels
Active research about Labels
User research - Moderation
Moderation Featuers for Admins are undergoing active User Research
User research - Needs input
Use this label to let the User Research team know their input is requested.
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
Research on how users should know what to do next.
User research - Rendering
Text rendering, markup languages etc
User research - Repo creation
Active research about the New Repo dialog.
User research - Repo units
The repo sections, disabling them and the "Add more" button.
User research - Security
User research - Settings (in-app)
How to structure in-app settings in the future?
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/meta#69
Reference in a new issue
forgejo/meta
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?