Archived
15
23
Fork
You've already forked meta
6

[Agreement Proposal] Merge the Well-Being team with the Moderation team. #170

Open
opened 2023年02月23日 17:44:39 +01:00 by fsologureng · 0 comments
Contributor
Copy link

I will formulate this in accordance with the comment made by @circlebuilder on decision-making (see comment), taken as a transitional decision-making template, and as a consequence of a proposition made by @tallship with which I agree.

Decision proposal

Background

  • I am witnessing two incidents related to moderation behaviour and community members' well-being have been addressed by the well-being team acting with attributions associated with the moderation team.
  • The shortage of dedicated human resources is evident
  • Responsibility for the resolution of major issues of aggression by a single person is unhealthy and risks being mismanaged.
  • AFAIK there are no professionals to take charge and advise on the execution of these tasks with mental health consequences.

Proposal

  • The well-being team should be merged with the moderation team, at least as a temporary measure.

Impact

  • All tasks dealt with by the well-Being team and the moderation team will be treated as one team sharing expertise and competences.

Who is affected?

  • The entire Forgejo community

Elements of work

  • Gather feedback from the current moderation and well-Being team.
    • Are they comfortable with the increased responsibility they will be taking on?
    • Are they going to resign?
  • Define the scope of the new Well-Being and Moderation team by merging the two definitions above.

Who can vote?

  • Anyone who takes note of the Proposed Decision can cast their vote.
I will formulate this in accordance with the comment made by @circlebuilder on decision-making (see [comment](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/168#issuecomment-811470)), taken as a transitional decision-making template, and as a consequence of a proposition made by @tallship with which [I agree](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/169#issuecomment-811838). ## Decision proposal ### Background - I am witnessing two incidents related to moderation behaviour and community members' well-being have been addressed by the well-being team acting with attributions associated with the moderation team. - The shortage of dedicated human resources is evident - Responsibility for the resolution of major issues of aggression by a single person is unhealthy and risks being mismanaged. - AFAIK there are no professionals to take charge and advise on the execution of these tasks with mental health consequences. ### Proposal - The well-being team should be merged with the moderation team, at least as a temporary measure. ### Impact - All tasks dealt with by the well-Being team and the moderation team will be treated as one team sharing expertise and competences. ### Who is affected? - The entire Forgejo community ### Elements of work - Gather feedback from the current moderation and well-Being team. - Are they comfortable with the increased responsibility they will be taking on? - Are they going to resign? - Define the scope of the new *Well-Being and Moderation* team by merging the two definitions above. ### Who can vote? - Anyone who takes note of the Proposed Decision can cast their vote.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No Branch/Tag specified
readme
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
[Decision] Building proposal(s)
We're in a decision-making process, buiding one or more proposals to address the shared aim based on the criteria
[Decision] Gathering criteria
We're in a decision-making process, gathering criteria, considerations and needs
[Decision] Integrating concerns
We're in a decision-making process, working with a proposal, trying to integrate concerns and create modifications/support such that the proposal works for everyone
Accessibility
Relates to Accessibility (a11y) of product, project and process.
Agreement proposal
Forgejo agreement proposal, following a discussion
Communication
Relates to all channels, social media, website, blog posts.
Election
Process of appointing a person into a role or team (if choosing people just for a specific one-time task, use the Entrustment label)
Entrustment
Process of choosing/approving specific people to do a critical/high-impact one-time task (if choosing people for an ongoing role/team, use the Election label)
Governance
Relates to processes, procedures and decision-making.
Meeting
An upcoming team meeting
User research - Accessibility
Requires input about accessibility features, likely involves user testing.
User research - Blocked
Do not pick as-is! We are happy if you can help, but please coordinate with ongoing redesign in this area.
User research - Community
Community features, such as discovering other people's work or otherwise feeling welcome on a Forgejo instance.
User research - Config (instance)
Instance-wide configuration, authentication and other admin-only needs.
User research - Errors
How to deal with errors in the application and write helpful error messages.
User research - Filters
How filter and search is being worked with.
User research - Future backlog
The issue might be inspiring for future design work.
User research - Git workflow
AGit, fork-based and new Git workflow, PR creation etc
User research - Labels
Active research about Labels
User research - Moderation
Moderation Featuers for Admins are undergoing active User Research
User research - Needs input
Use this label to let the User Research team know their input is requested.
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
Research on how users should know what to do next.
User research - Rendering
Text rendering, markup languages etc
User research - Repo creation
Active research about the New Repo dialog.
User research - Repo units
The repo sections, disabling them and the "Add more" button.
User research - Security
User research - Settings (in-app)
How to structure in-app settings in the future?
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/meta#170
Reference in a new issue
forgejo/meta
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?