forgejo-contrib/forgejo-cli
20
407
Fork
You've already forked forgejo-cli
51

fix: parsing scp-like remote url syntax #542

Merged
Cyborus merged 2 commits from piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli:ginal/fix-scp-url into main 2026年07月06日 21:16:56 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

Changes Made

When trying to use the CLI with the foolowing remote url configured (as the only remote): git@codeberg.org:piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli.git

I got the following error:

$ fj --host codeberg.org repo view
Error: relative URL without a base
Location:
 src/repo.rs:136:43

The same remote (same repo etc) but with cli compiled on ade375d23c

$ ./target/release/fj --host codeberg.org repo view
keys file not found, creating
piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli
Fork of forgejo-contrib/forgejo-cli

The problem causing this was introduced in 1df2ad5b01 #462

git show 1df2ad5b01f3fec5786b81f51dd7751b3ad768a1 -- src/main.rs

 fn ssh_url_parse(s: &str) -> Result<url::Url, url::ParseError> {
- url::Url::parse(s).or_else(|_| {
+ let mut url = url::Url::parse(s)?;
+ if url.cannot_be_a_base() {
 let mut new_s = String::new();
 new_s.push_str("ssh://");
 let auth_end = s.find("@").unwrap_or(0);
 new_s.push_str(&s[..auth_end]);
 new_s.push_str(&s[auth_end..].replacen(":", "/", 1));
- url::Url::parse(&new_s)
- })
+ url = url::Url::parse(&new_s)?
+ }

The scp-like syntax (user@host:path) fails Url::parse outright with a parse error, so it never reaches the cannot_be_a_base() check.

@tpikonen Am i missing something here?

Also, ive written two simple test cases showing this bug, feel free to check out at the commit adding the test and run cargo test to see for yourself.

As these would be the only tests in this repo, just let me know and ill drop the commit from the PR

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to act in accordance with the CoC & AI Agreement.
  • This contribution was not generated by an LLM, even in part.
### Changes Made When trying to use the CLI with the foolowing remote url configured (as the only remote): `git@codeberg.org:piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli.git` I got the following error: ``` $ fj --host codeberg.org repo view Error: relative URL without a base Location: src/repo.rs:136:43 ``` The same remote (same repo etc) but with cli compiled on ade375d23c07a5c9dc1b01568ef0c9703f18a3aa ``` $ ./target/release/fj --host codeberg.org repo view keys file not found, creating piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli Fork of forgejo-contrib/forgejo-cli ``` The problem causing this was introduced in 1df2ad5b01f3fec5786b81f51dd7751b3ad768a1 #462 `git show 1df2ad5b01f3fec5786b81f51dd7751b3ad768a1 -- src/main.rs` ```diff fn ssh_url_parse(s: &str) -> Result<url::Url, url::ParseError> { - url::Url::parse(s).or_else(|_| { + let mut url = url::Url::parse(s)?; + if url.cannot_be_a_base() { let mut new_s = String::new(); new_s.push_str("ssh://"); let auth_end = s.find("@").unwrap_or(0); new_s.push_str(&s[..auth_end]); new_s.push_str(&s[auth_end..].replacen(":", "/", 1)); - url::Url::parse(&new_s) - }) + url = url::Url::parse(&new_s)? + } ``` The scp-like syntax (`user@host:path`) fails `Url::parse` outright with a parse error, so it never reaches the `cannot_be_a_base()` check. @tpikonen Am i missing something here? Also, ive written two simple test cases showing this bug, feel free to check out at the commit adding the test and run `cargo test` to see for yourself. As these would be the only tests in this repo, just let me know and ill drop the commit from the PR ### Code of Conduct - [x] I agree to act in accordance with the CoC & AI Agreement. - [x] This contribution was not generated by an LLM, even in part.
fix: parsing scp-like remote url syntax
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-typos Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-clippy Pipeline was successful
fcbd2e860f
piotr-ginal force-pushed ginal/fix-scp-url from fcbd2e860f
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-typos Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-clippy Pipeline was successful
to 8ce903e0b2
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-typos Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-clippy Pipeline was successful
2026年07月02日 22:29:43 +02:00
Compare
piotr-ginal force-pushed ginal/fix-scp-url from 8ce903e0b2
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-typos Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-clippy Pipeline was successful
to 8bf319223a
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-typos Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/check-clippy Pipeline was successful
2026年07月03日 00:36:48 +02:00
Compare
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
Kind/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible
Kind/Bug
Something is not working
Kind/Design
Discussion about UI/UX design
Kind/Documentation
Documentation changes
Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
Kind/Feature
New functionality
Kind/Security
This is security issue
Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing
Kind/Upstream
This is an issue with upstream software (Forgejo) that is probably not our fault
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
Suspicious
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo-contrib/forgejo-cli!542
Reference in a new issue
forgejo-contrib/forgejo-cli
No description provided.
Delete branch "piotr-ginal/forgejo-cli:ginal/fix-scp-url"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?