7
31
Fork
You've already forked blackmagic
23

Fix: riscv_debug stack buffer overflow in 128-bit CSR access #2240

Merged
dragonmux merged 1 commit from mTOTm/blackmagic:dev/jiance.zhang/fix_bmda_crash into main 2026年05月05日 09:05:27 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

Detailed description

The purpose of this PR is to fix the crash of BMDA under specific conditions. The failure condition is: "Set 'CFLAG' to '-fstack-protector-strong', when debugging a RISC-V target with 4 data registers." This was first discovered when debugging the HPM chip in Ubuntu 22.04. Thank you @ALTracer for helping to locate the issue. It was resolved by increasing the size of the local array in the register, and the test with STLINK-V2-BMP was successful.

Test Log

./build_stlink/blackmagic -tj
Black Magic Debug App v2.0.0-531-gff4d9e2f-dirty
 for Black Magic Probe, ST-Link v2 and v3, CMSIS-DAP, J-Link, FTDI (MPSSE) and WCH-Link
Using 1d50:6018 DFD496DE Black Magic Debug
 Black Magic Probe (ST-Link/v2) v2.0.0-503-gd8d74921-dirty
Running in Test Mode
Target voltage: 3.30V
Speed set to 6.000MHz for JTAG
Resetting TAP
Change state to Shift-DR
Scanning out ID codes
Return to Run-Test/Idle
Change state to Shift-IR
Scanning out IRs
Return to Run-Test/Idle
Change state to Shift-DR
Return to Run-Test/Idle
ID code 0x1000563d: Andes Tech RISC-V DTM.
RISC-V debug v0.13/v1.0 DMI
RISC-V debug v0.13 DM
Hart has 4 data registers and 8 progbuf registers
Attempting 128-bit read on misa
CSR access failed: 2
CSR access failed: 2
CSR access failed: 2
CSR access failed: 2
Attempting 64-bit read on misa
CSR access failed: 3
CSR access failed: 3
CSR access failed: 3
Attempting 32-bit read on misa
Hart 0: 32-bit RISC-V (arch = 80000025), rv32igcb ISA (exts = 0090112f), vendor = 61e, impl = 410
Hart has 8 trigger slots available
-> riscv32_probe
Please report unknown device with Designer 0x61e
Probing failed, please report unknown RISC-V 32 device
*** 1 RISC-V rv32igcb

Your checklist for this pull request

Closing issues

Fixes #2239.

<!-- Filling this template is mandatory --> ## Detailed description The purpose of this PR is to fix the crash of BMDA under specific conditions. The failure condition is: "Set 'CFLAG' to '-fstack-protector-strong', when debugging a RISC-V target with 4 data registers." This was first discovered when debugging the HPM chip in Ubuntu 22.04. Thank you @ALTracer for helping to locate the issue. It was resolved by increasing the size of the local array in the register, and the test with STLINK-V2-BMP was successful. ### Test Log ```bash ./build_stlink/blackmagic -tj Black Magic Debug App v2.0.0-531-gff4d9e2f-dirty for Black Magic Probe, ST-Link v2 and v3, CMSIS-DAP, J-Link, FTDI (MPSSE) and WCH-Link Using 1d50:6018 DFD496DE Black Magic Debug Black Magic Probe (ST-Link/v2) v2.0.0-503-gd8d74921-dirty Running in Test Mode Target voltage: 3.30V Speed set to 6.000MHz for JTAG Resetting TAP Change state to Shift-DR Scanning out ID codes Return to Run-Test/Idle Change state to Shift-IR Scanning out IRs Return to Run-Test/Idle Change state to Shift-DR Return to Run-Test/Idle ID code 0x1000563d: Andes Tech RISC-V DTM. RISC-V debug v0.13/v1.0 DMI RISC-V debug v0.13 DM Hart has 4 data registers and 8 progbuf registers Attempting 128-bit read on misa CSR access failed: 2 CSR access failed: 2 CSR access failed: 2 CSR access failed: 2 Attempting 64-bit read on misa CSR access failed: 3 CSR access failed: 3 CSR access failed: 3 Attempting 32-bit read on misa Hart 0: 32-bit RISC-V (arch = 80000025), rv32igcb ISA (exts = 0090112f), vendor = 61e, impl = 410 Hart has 8 trigger slots available -> riscv32_probe Please report unknown device with Designer 0x61e Probing failed, please report unknown RISC-V 32 device *** 1 RISC-V rv32igcb ``` <!-- Explain the **details** for making this change. * Is a new feature implemented? * What existing problem(s) does the pull request solve? * How does the pull request solve these problems? Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request. Information embedded in the description part of the commits doesn't count. --> ## Your checklist for this pull request * [x] I've read the [Code of Conduct](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/src/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've read the [guidelines for contributing](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/src/CONTRIBUTING.md) to this repository * [x] It builds for hardware native (see [Building the firmware](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic?tab=readme-ov-file#building-the-firmware)) * [x] It builds as BMDA (see [Building the BMDA](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic?tab=readme-ov-file#building-black-magic-debug-app)) * [x] I've tested it to the best of my ability * [x] My commit messages provide a useful short description of what the commits do ## Closing issues Fixes #2239. <!-- put "fixes #XXXX" here to auto-close the issue(s) that your PR fixes (if any). -->
riscv_debug: Fix stack buffer overflow in 128-bit CSR access
Some checks are pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/1 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/2 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/3 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/4 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/5 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/6 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/7 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/8 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/9 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/10 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/11 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/12 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/13 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/14 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/15 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/16 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/17 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/18 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/19 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/20 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/1 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/2 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-windows Pipeline is pending approval
ff4d9e2fe5
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
dragonmux left a comment
Copy link

LGTM, merging once CI completes. Thank you for the contribution!

LGTM, merging once CI completes. Thank you for the contribution!
mTOTm force-pushed dev/jiance.zhang/fix_bmda_crash from 5a293aae69
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/5 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/6 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/4 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/3 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/7 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/10 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/12 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/11 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/9 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/8 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/18 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/13 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/15 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/17 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/14 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/16 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/19 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/20 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-windows Pipeline was successful
to 85fcb0ef1d
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/16 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/15 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/19 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/17 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-windows Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/lint Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/3 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/5 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/4 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/6 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/7 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/13 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/9 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/10 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/8 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/14 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/11 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/12 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-linux/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/15 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/16 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/19 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/18 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/20 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/17 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-linux/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-windows Pipeline was successful
2026年05月05日 08:03:58 +02:00
Compare
Author
Contributor
Copy link

@dragonmux wrote in #2240 (comment):

LGTM, merging once CI completes. Thank you for the contribution!

I have rebased this PR onto main.

@dragonmux wrote in https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/pulls/2240#issuecomment-14221922: > LGTM, merging once CI completes. Thank you for the contribution! I have rebased this PR onto main.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
BMD App
Black Magic Debug App (aka. PC hosted) (not firmware)
BMP Firmware
Black Magic Probe Firmware (not PC hosted software)
Bug
Confirmed bug
Build system
Build system
Can't reproduce
Maintainers can't reproduce this problem
CI
Continuous Integration System
Contribution wanted
User contributions welcome
Documentation
Project documentation
Draft
Work in progress draft
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Enhancement
General project improvement
Feedback wanted
Requires additional submitter feedback
Foreign Host Board
Non Native hardware to runing Black Magic firmware on
GDB
Issue/PR related to GDB
Good first issue
Good for newcommers
HwIssue Mitigation
Solving or mitigating a Hardware issue in Software
Information Needed
Maintainers need more information
NativeHardware
Official Black Magic Debug Hardware
New Host Board
New hardware to run Black Magic firmware on
New Target
New debug target
Off Topic
Something that does not involve the project in any way
Potential Bug
A potential, unconfirmed or very special circumstance bug
Regression
Bug caused by a regression
User Interest Needed
More user interest required before consideration
User Testing Needed
Looking for user testing reports
Won't fix
Outside of the project scope or works as intended
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
blackmagic-debug/blackmagic!2240
Reference in a new issue
blackmagic-debug/blackmagic
No description provided.
Delete branch "mTOTm/blackmagic:dev/jiance.zhang/fix_bmda_crash"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?