8
33
Fork
You've already forked blackmagic
23

Fix: Preserve RISC-V hart flags when enabling SysBus #2231

Merged
dragonmux merged 1 commit from ALTracer/blackmagic:fix/riscv-sysbus-hart-flags into main 2026年04月17日 00:17:09 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

Detailed description

  • This is a minor bugfix.
  • The existing problem is some BMD-internal hart->flags becoming unset by SysBus detection routine.
  • The PR fixes it by using the corresponding "or-equal" bit-masking operator.

Because in riscv_hart_init() riscv_hart_discover_isa() runs first, and possibly sets the new RV_HART_FLAG_MEMORY_PROGBUF, but then riscv_hart_memory_access_type() runs second, and overrides the hart->flags value, the first set flag is lost.

Lines 507 to 511 in a523f16
uint32_t isa = riscv_hart_discover_isa(hart);
hart->address_width = riscv_isa_address_width(isa);
hart->extensions = isa & RV_ISA_EXTENSIONS_MASK;
/* Figure out if the target needs us to use sysbus or not for memory access */
riscv_hart_memory_access_type(target);


I think I'll want to preserve progbuf- and abstractauto- related flags, especially as that method can potentially read memory 1.75x faster than SBA (at the cost of halting the hart).
Encountered and tested on modified Hazard3 where I've enabled HAVE_SBA=1, but wanted to test single-progbuf, by unsetting a hart flag in hazard3_probe(), with the result that none of two methods got used, and AAM (fallback path) is not even implemented in that softcore as of v1.0.1.

Your checklist for this pull request

Closing issues

## Detailed description * This is a minor bugfix. * The existing problem is some BMD-internal `hart->flags` becoming unset by SysBus detection routine. * The PR fixes it by using the corresponding "or-equal" bit-masking operator. Because in riscv_hart_init() `riscv_hart_discover_isa()` runs first, and possibly sets the new `RV_HART_FLAG_MEMORY_PROGBUF`, but then `riscv_hart_memory_access_type()` runs second, and overrides the hart->flags value, the first set flag is lost. https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/src/commit/a523f16a110d14fe60a77f79cc43ab13e51f12b5/src/target/riscv_debug.c#L507-L511 I think I'll want to preserve progbuf- and abstractauto- related flags, especially as that method can potentially read memory 1.75x faster than SBA (at the cost of halting the hart). Encountered and tested on modified Hazard3 where I've enabled HAVE_SBA=1, but wanted to test single-progbuf, by unsetting a hart flag in `hazard3_probe()`, with the result that none of two methods got used, and AAM (fallback path) is not even implemented in that softcore as of v1.0.1. ## Your checklist for this pull request * [x] I've read the [Code of Conduct](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/src/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've read the [guidelines for contributing](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/src/CONTRIBUTING.md) to this repository * [x] It builds for hardware native (see [Building the firmware](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic?tab=readme-ov-file#building-the-firmware)) * [x] It builds as BMDA (see [Building the BMDA](https://codeberg.org/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic?tab=readme-ov-file#building-black-magic-debug-app)) * [x] I've tested it to the best of my ability * [x] My commit messages provide a useful short description of what the commits do ## Closing issues
ALTracer force-pushed fix/riscv-sysbus-hart-flags from d81ddf82a0
Some checks are pending
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/1 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/2 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/3 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/4 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/5 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/6 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/7 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/8 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/9 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/10 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/11 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/12 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/13 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/14 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/15 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/16 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/17 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/18 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/19 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/20 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/1 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/2 Pipeline is pending approval
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-windows Pipeline is pending approval
to a3f2ad1fe0
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-linux/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/18 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/20 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/19 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-windows Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/build-firmware/17 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/6 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/5 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/4 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/3 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/7 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/8 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/9 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/15 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/13 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/12 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/14 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/11 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/16 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/17 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/10 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/18 Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/push/build-linux/1 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/19 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-firmware/20 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-linux/2 Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/build-windows Pipeline was successful
2026年04月16日 05:54:27 +02:00
Compare
dragonmux left a comment
Copy link

LGTM, merging. Thank you for fixing this and thank you for the contribution!

LGTM, merging. Thank you for fixing this and thank you for the contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
BMD App
Black Magic Debug App (aka. PC hosted) (not firmware)
BMP Firmware
Black Magic Probe Firmware (not PC hosted software)
Bug
Confirmed bug
Build system
Build system
Can't reproduce
Maintainers can't reproduce this problem
CI
Continuous Integration System
Contribution wanted
User contributions welcome
Documentation
Project documentation
Draft
Work in progress draft
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Enhancement
General project improvement
Feedback wanted
Requires additional submitter feedback
Foreign Host Board
Non Native hardware to runing Black Magic firmware on
GDB
Issue/PR related to GDB
Good first issue
Good for newcommers
HwIssue Mitigation
Solving or mitigating a Hardware issue in Software
Information Needed
Maintainers need more information
NativeHardware
Official Black Magic Debug Hardware
New Host Board
New hardware to run Black Magic firmware on
New Target
New debug target
Off Topic
Something that does not involve the project in any way
Potential Bug
A potential, unconfirmed or very special circumstance bug
Regression
Bug caused by a regression
User Interest Needed
More user interest required before consideration
User Testing Needed
Looking for user testing reports
Won't fix
Outside of the project scope or works as intended
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
blackmagic-debug/blackmagic!2231
Reference in a new issue
blackmagic-debug/blackmagic
No description provided.
Delete branch "ALTracer/blackmagic:fix/riscv-sysbus-hart-flags"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?