- C 99.4%
- Makefile 0.6%
| .gitignore | remove krita files, update .gitignore | |
| AGENTS.md | enhance AGENTS.md | |
| LICENSE | add LICENSE | |
| Makefile | init | |
| README.md | add logo | |
| tcd.c | add newline at end of file (tcd.c) | |
| tcd.png | update logo | |
tcd - Transcode Detector
tcd analyses an audio file's frequency spectrum to determine whether it is a
genuine native encode or a transcode (a lossy → lossless re-encode). It can
also detect upscaling (a lossy file that has been re-encoded at a higher
bitrate by the same lossy codec, e.g. 128 → 320 kbps MP3).
Obligatory AI-slop disclaimer
tcd is 98% vibe-coded (a.k.a. "ai slop"). If that's a problem for you, please
kindly just use a different tool. There is also absolutely NO guarantee this
will work reliably, be useful in any way, or even make any sense whatsoever.
Careful! Dragons ahead!
tcd can and absolutely will delete your data. Don't blindly use -a, and
please read at least the --help information and understand what -a does.
How it works (precise description)
tcd decodes the audio file to PCM via FFmpeg, applies a Hann window, and computes the FFT (default 4096-point) with 50% overlap for each windowed frame. Magnitude spectra from all frames are accumulated and averaged into a single power spectrum. From this averaged spectrum, five metrics are computed:
- Cutoff: highest frequency bin whose magnitude ≥ peak ×ばつ 10^(threshold_db/20), controlled by the sensitivity setting (see Threshold sensitivity).
- Steepness: transition bandwidth between the −20 dB and −60 dB points (relative to peak), measuring how sharply the spectrum rolls off.
- Noise floor: average magnitude in the top quartile of the spectrum (≈16500–22050 Hz at 44.1 kHz sample rate), expressed in dB relative to peak.
- Roughness: coefficient of variation (standard deviation / mean) of magnitude values in the 60%–95% band below cutoff. This quantifies spectral irregularity introduced by quantization noise.
- Band ratio: ratio of mean magnitude in 16–20 kHz to mean magnitude in 12–16 kHz. Lossy codecs under-allocate bits above 16 kHz, producing a characteristic dip in this region.
The verdict is determined by evaluating these metrics against empirically derived thresholds (which are scaled by the sensitivity setting), first using cutoff + steepness, then secondarily using roughness + band ratio for high-cutoff cases. For lossy input formats, cutoff is compared against bitrate-specific expectations to detect upscaling.
What tcd displays and what each number means
Here is example output from an MP3 file:
File: ./08 You Got Me.mp3
Format: mp3
Bitrate: 320 kbps
Sample rate: 44100 Hz
Channels: 2
Windows: 13550
Peak: 47.5 dBFS
Cutoff: 20790 / 22050 Hz = 94.3%
Steepness: 20209 Hz
Roughness: 0.323
Band ratio: 0.555
Noise floor: -56.4 dB
Verdict: NATIVE
Verdict Info: bandwidth used=94.3% (20790/22050 Hz), expected≥90% for 320 kbps
Each metric is explained below.
Cutoff (20790 / 22050 Hz = 94.3%)
What it is: The highest frequency where the audio still has measurable energy. Everything above this point is silence or noise.
The Nyquist ceiling: Digital audio is made of snapshots (samples). For CD quality (44100 snapshots per second), there is a hard limit: you cannot store a frequency higher than half the snapshot rate = 22050 Hz. This is called the Nyquist frequency. It is a physical ceiling - higher frequencies simply cannot exist.
How lossy encoding changes it: MP3 and other lossy codecs deliberately cut off high frequencies to save space. The cutoff gets lower as the bitrate drops:
| Bitrate | Typical cutoff | Audio quality impact |
|---|---|---|
| 320 kbps | ≥20000 Hz (≥90%) | Keeps almost all audible high end |
| 256 kbps | ≥19000 Hz (≥86%) | Still very clean |
| 192 kbps | ~17500 Hz (~79%) | Moderate high-end roll-off |
| 128 kbps | ~16000 Hz (~73%) | Noticeable treble loss |
| 96 kbps | ~13000 Hz (~59%) | Significant high-end missing |
| 64 kbps | ~11000 Hz (~50%) | Sounds dull, heavily filtered |
What 94.3% means for the example file: 20790 / 22050 = 94.3%. The cutoff is very close to the theoretical maximum. This is what we expect from a 320 kbps encode. If this same file showed 54% (~12000 Hz), it would mean the treble was chopped off by an aggressive low-bitrate encoder, and someone just re-encoded it at 320 kbps - the cutoff is permanent and cannot be restored. That would be an UPSCALED file.
Steepness
What it measures: How abruptly the sound drops off at the cutoff point. tcd measures this as the frequency gap between the −20 dB point (still loud) and the −60 dB cutoff (essentially silent). A narrow gap = a sharp drop.
The analogy: Imagine the frequency graph as a mountain ridge. A lossless recording rolls off like a natural hillside - gradual, smooth, taking thousands of Hz to go from loud to silent. A lossy encoder's lowpass filter creates a cliff - a near-vertical drop from audible signal to nothing.
What the number means: Steepness is the width (in Hz) of that drop zone. The smaller the number, the sharper the cliff:
| Steepness | What it looks like | Likely origin |
|---|---|---|
| <500 Hz | Brick-wall drop | Lossy encoder (MP3, AAC) |
| 500–2000 Hz | Fairly sharp | Could be lossy or aggressive production filter |
| 2000–5000 Hz | Moderate | Might be natural |
| >5000 Hz | Gentle slope | Natural acoustic roll-off (lossless) |
To understand steepness, imagine a guitar string being plucked. The sound naturally fades across many frequencies - the harmonics near the top end of your hearing get quieter and quieter over a broad range. This is a gentle slope. Now imagine someone put a pair of scissors on the frequency spectrum and cut everything above a certain note. That sharp edge - the difference between "still audible" and "completely gone" in just a few hundred Hz - is what lossy compression does. The steepness number tells you how sharp that scissor cut was.
Roughness (0.323)
What it measures: How "bumpy" or "irregular" the spectrum looks just before the cutoff point.
The analogy: Lossy encoding introduces quantization noise - tiny rounding errors that are unevenly distributed across frequencies. In the frequency graph, this looks like a jagged, bumpy line instead of a smooth one. Think of it like a dirt road vs a paved highway: lossless audio is smooth, lossy audio is bumpy. Double-encoded audio (a transcode) is even bumpier because the errors from two encodings stack on top of each other.
What the number means:
| Roughness | What it looks like | Likely origin |
|---|---|---|
| <0.15 | Very smooth | Natural/lossless |
| 0.15–0.30 | Slightly bumpy | Could be lossy single encode |
| 0.30–0.50 | Clearly bumpy | Lossy single encode, or borderline transcode |
| >0.50 | Very jagged | Almost certainly a transcode |
Band ratio (0.555)
What it measures: How much high-frequency energy (16–20 kHz) remains compared to mid-high energy (12–16 kHz).
Why it matters: Human hearing is least sensitive above 16 kHz. Lossy encoders exploit this by spending almost no bits on those frequencies. The result is that the 16–20 kHz region is much quieter than the 12–16 kHz region. In native recordings, this drop is modest; in lossy/transcoded material, it is severe.
What the number means: Band ratio = energy in 16–20 kHz band ÷ energy in 12–16 kHz band. A ratio of 1.0 means both bands are equally loud. A ratio of 0.5 means the top band is half as loud.
| Band ratio | What it means |
|---|---|
| >0.85 | Healthy high end - likely native lossless |
| 0.70–0.85 | Mild roll-off - could be lossy or natural |
| 0.50–0.70 | Significant high-end loss - likely lossy |
| <0.50 | Severe high-end loss - almost certainly lossy or transcoded |
Noise floor (-56.4 dB)
What it measures: The average noise level in the highest quarter of the frequency range (roughly 16500–22050 Hz).
The analogy: Imagine listening in a quiet room - the background hiss is very low. Now imagine that same room with a fan running - the background noise rises. A lossy encoder introduces quantization noise that raises the "background hiss" in the high frequencies.
What the number means: This is measured in decibels (dB). More negative = quieter (better). Less negative = noisier (worse):
| Noise floor | What it means |
|---|---|
| −90 to −110 dB | Very clean - native lossless |
| −70 to −90 dB | Moderate - could be lossy or quiet lossless |
| −50 to −70 dB | Noisy - likely lossy |
| >−50 dB | Very noisy - almost certainly lossy or transcoded |
How tcd combines these clues into a verdict
tcd does not rely on any single metric. It combines them in stages, like a detective building a case.
Scenario 1: The input file is lossy (MP3, AAC, etc.)
The file already claims to be lossy. The question is: was it originally encoded at the stated bitrate, or was it re-encoded from a lower bitrate?
The check: tcd compares the cutoff against what is expected for that bitrate:
| Stated bitrate | Expected cutoff |
|---|---|
| <192 kbps | ≥75% of Nyquist |
| 192–255 kbps | ≥85% of Nyquist |
| ≥256 kbps | ≥90% of Nyquist |
If the actual cutoff is more than 8 percentage points lower than expected, the file is UPSCALED. For example, a file claiming 320 kbps (expecting ≥90%) but showing a cutoff of 70% (≈15400 Hz) would be flagged as upscaled from ~96 kbps.
Otherwise it is NATIVE - a genuine single encode at this bitrate.
Scenario 2: The input file is lossless (FLAC, WAV, ALAC, etc.)
The file claims to be lossless. The question is: was it actually created by decoding a lossy file and re-encoding to lossless?
tcd uses a two-layer check:
Layer 1 - Cutoff + Steepness (primary):
| Cutoff range | Max steepness allowed | If exceeded → |
|---|---|---|
| <50% of Nyquist | 4000 Hz | TRANSCODE |
| 50–70% | 3000 Hz | TRANSCODE |
| 70–80% | 2000 Hz | TRANSCODE |
| 80–90% | 1200 Hz | TRANSCODE |
| ≥90% | 500 Hz | TRANSCODE |
This works because lossy cutoffs are always sharp (low steepness). A lossless recording that happens to have a low cutoff (e.g., a muddy recording with little treble) would still have a gradual roll-off (high steepness) - you need both a low cutoff and a sharp drop to convict.
Layer 2 - Roughness + Band ratio (secondary):
If Layer 1 did not trigger but the cutoff is above 80%, tcd checks roughness and band ratio. This catches transcodes where the cutoff happens to be high enough to pass Layer 1 but the spectrum is still bumpy and depleted in the top band:
| Roughness | Band ratio | If matched → |
|---|---|---|
| >0.40 | any | TRANSCODE |
| >0.30 | <0.90 | TRANSCODE |
| >0.20 | <0.85 | TRANSCODE |
If neither layer triggers, the file is GENUINE (native lossless).
The verdicts at a glance
| Verdict | Input codec | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| NATIVE | lossy | Encoded once at the stated bitrate - genuine |
| UPSCALED | lossy | Originally encoded at a lower bitrate, then re-encoded higher |
| GENUINE | lossless | Appears to be native lossless - no evidence of lossy origin |
| TRANSCODE | lossless | Originated from a lossy source, decoded to lossless |
| SILENT | any | No detectable audio content |
Threshold sensitivity (-t)
The -t parameter (1–99, default 50) controls how aggressively tcd detects
transcodes and upscaled files. It works at two levels.
1. Cutoff detection threshold
The cutoff frequency is defined as the highest bin whose magnitude is at
least peak ×ばつ 10^(threshold_db / 20). The percentage is mapped linearly
to dB:
threshold_db = −(40 + (pct − 1) ×ばつ 40 / 98)
-t value |
threshold_db | Magnitude threshold | Behaviour |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −40.0 dB | 1.0 % of peak | Least sensitive – only the strongest signal counts |
| 50 | −60.0 dB | 0.1 % of peak | Default – balances sensitivity and specificity |
| 99 | −80.0 dB | 0.01 % of peak | Most sensitive – detects cutoff deep in the noise floor |
A higher -t (more negative dB) detects the cutoff at a higher frequency
because it can follow the spectrum deeper into the noise floor. This makes
the tool stricter: small spectral remnants above a true lossy cutoff are
still recognised as "signal."
2. Verdict-threshold scaling
The same percentage also produces a continuous sensitivity factor:
sensitivity = (pct − 1) / 98.0
-t value |
sensitivity | Effect on verdict thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.00 | Doubles the allowed steepness – very permissive, few false positives |
| 50 | 0.50 | Base thresholds used as published above |
| 99 | 1.00 | Steepness limits multiplied by 0.25; roughness thresholds lowered by up to ×ばつ – very strict, catches borderline cases |
The table of steepness thresholds used in the transcode verdict (see How tcd combines these clues) is scaled by:
bw_factor = max(2.0 ×ばつ (1.0 − sensitivity), 0.25)
allowed_steepness = base_max_bw ×ばつ bw_factor
The roughness thresholds (r1 = 0.40, r2 = 0.30, r3 = 0.20) are likewise scaled:
r1 = 0.40 ×ばつ (1.0 + (0.5 − sensitivity) ×ばつ 1.5)
r2 = 0.30 ×ばつ (1.0 + (0.5 − sensitivity) ×ばつ 1.5)
r3 = 0.20 ×ばつ (1.0 + (0.5 − sensitivity) ×ばつ 1.5)
3. Practical guidance
- Default (50): well-tuned for most material. Use this unless you have a specific reason to change it.
- Lower values (1–40): reduce false positives on already-filtered material (e.g. deliberate lowpass during mastering). Rarely needed.
- Higher values (60–99): catch transcodes that leave very little spectral evidence. Useful for batch cleaning of a library, but may increase false positives on quiet or synthetic content.
Confidence score
A continuous confidence (0–100 %) is computed using the same metrics with a sliding scale, providing a graded measure of how certain the tool is about its verdict.
Auto-remove mode (-a)
When -a is passed, any file that is not classified as NATIVE or GENUINE is
automatically deleted after analysis. This is useful for batch cleanup of
corrupt or transcoded libraries. Careful - this will eat data.
Why the method is (somewhat!) scientifically reliable
1. Lossy encoding leaves a permanent spectral fingerprint
Every lossy audio codec discards information. The most obvious form is a lowpass filter - once applied, the frequencies above the cutoff are gone forever. Decoding back to PCM and re-encoding to lossless cannot restore them. This means a "lossless" FLAC file made from an MP3 will contain the MP3's permanent spectral cutoff.
2. Steepness catches the filter shape
Lossy encoders use sharp digital filters (brick-wall style) that drop from audible to silent in a few hundred Hz. Natural acoustic sources (voice, instruments, room ambience) roll off gradually over many kHz. A drop steeper than 2 kHz at any cutoff position is extremely unlikely to occur naturally.
- MP3 (ISO/IEC 11172-3): typical roll-off of several hundred Hz to ~2 kHz
- AAC (ISO/IEC 13818-7): sharper, often 200–800 Hz
- Vorbis: variable but always steeper than natural
3. Roughness detects double-encoding noise
When audio is lossy-encoded, quantization noise is shaped to be masked by the music. Re-encoding adds a second layer of noise-shaping, creating irregularities in the spectrum that are statistically unlikely in a single encode.
4. Band ratio exploits the Fletcher–Munson curves
Human hearing is least sensitive above 16 kHz. Lossy encoders exploit this by spending almost no bits there. In native recordings, the 16–20 kHz region is typically only 2–6 dB quieter than 12–16 kHz (band ratio 0.5–1.0). In transcoded material it is often 10–20 dB quieter (band ratio < 0.3).
5. Multiple independent metrics prevent false positives
No single metric is perfectly reliable. A low cutoff could occur in a genuine recording that used an aggressive lowpass during mastering. By requiring both a low cutoff and a sharp roll-off (primary), or both high roughness and a low band ratio (secondary), the tool avoids false positives.
6. The upscaling detector is conservative
For lossy files, an 8-percentage-point margin is subtracted before flagging a file as upscaled. This accounts for encoder variability and prevents false positives on legitimate encodes that simply use a conservative lowpass.
Usage
tcd [options] <audio-file>
When run, tcd prints an analysis summary. Example:
File: ./08 You Got Me.mp3
Format: mp3
Bitrate: 320 kbps
Sample rate: 44100 Hz
Channels: 2
Windows: 13550
Peak: 47.5 dBFS
Cutoff: 20790 / 22050 Hz = 94.3%
Steepness: 20209 Hz
Roughness: 0.323
Band ratio: 0.555
Noise floor: -56.4 dB
Verdict: NATIVE
Verdict Info: bandwidth used=94.3% (20790/22050 Hz), expected≥90% for 320 kbps
Each field is explained in the What each number means section.
Options:
-t, --threshold PCT Detection sensitivity 1-99 [50]
-f, --fft-size N FFT size, power of 2 [4096]
-d, --duration SEC Seconds to analyze [120]
-r, --recursive Recurse into subdirectories
-F, --full Analyze entire file (no duration limit)
-v, --verbose Verbose output with decision log
-s, --visual Graphical spectrum TUI visualization
-V Alias for -s
-a, --auto-remove Automatically delete detected transcodes
-h, --help Show this help screen
Exit codes:
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | NATIVE or GENUINE (file is clean) |
| 1 | UPSCALED or TRANSCODE detected |
| 2 | SILENT (no detectable content) |
Limitations
- Very short files (<
fft_sizesamples) cannot be analysed. Use-fto reduce the FFT size. - Already-lowpass-filtered material (e.g. deliberate 15 kHz LPF during mastering) may trigger false positives. The confidence score helps assess borderline cases.
- High-bitrate lossy encodes (320 kbps MP3, 256 kbps AAC) have cutoffs very close to Nyquist and may not be distinguishable from lossless by cutoff alone. The tool relies on roughness and band ratio in this regime.
- Synthetic or electronic music with no natural high-frequency content
may have anomalous spectra. Use the visual mode (
-s) to inspect the spectrum manually.
References (freely available)
- Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem
- Equal-loudness contour (Fletcher–Munson curves) - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-loudness_contour
- LAME MP3 encoder psychoacoustic model - Hydrogenaudio Knowledge Base https://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME
- MP3 lowpass filter cutoffs by bitrate - Hydrogenaudio forum discussion https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,71398.0.html
- GPSYCHO - open-source psychoacoustic model (used by LAME) https://lame.sourceforge.io/gpsycho.php
- LAME source code (lowpass filter implementation) - GitHub https://github.com/lameproject/lame
- "Audio Authentication Using Spectral Analysis" - University of Michigan open-access thesis, 2025 https://doi.org/10.7302/28306