Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery heiko.thiery@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
hthiery/ipmitool:feature/vita-extension into master
Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery heiko.thiery@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
@ -211,3 +211,3 @@
lprintf(LOG_INFO, "Unknown VSO Standard %d",
(rsp->data[3] & 0x03));
} else if ((rsp->data[4] & 0x0F) != 1) {
} else if ((rsp->data[4] & 0x0F) != 1 && (rsp->data[4] & 0x0F) != 2) {
Are you sure that it is safe to assume vita_avail for revision 2.x without actually adding support for it in the calling code? At least an explanation in a comment somewhere near else below is needed to explain why this approach is safe.
Closing this w/o merging as the author doesn't seem to care anymore, and the change is dubious.
No due date set.
No dependencies set.
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?