Contact: Add 'Community channels' section to Abuse #685

n0toose commented 2025年10月20日 08:06:52 +02:00

(either specific moderators or the lack of said moderation)

Keep in mind that I have been in a dispute over my moderation with a participant at least once. In such cases, I would like to provide an additional means of recourse (or at least have a third person get in between).

We should probably make "points of contact" with the option to directly contact in the future (not necessarily an awareness team, but would be a neat first step).

(either specific moderators or the lack of said moderation) Keep in mind that I have been in a dispute over my moderation with a participant at least once. In such cases, I would like to provide an additional means of recourse (or at least have a third person get in between). We should probably make "points of contact" with the option to directly contact in the future (not necessarily an awareness team, but would be a neat first step).

n0toose commented 2025年10月20日 08:18:01 +02:00

We have banned people (i.e. known bad faith actors) preemptively from our Matrix chats before. We have banned people that received repeated warnings over concern trolling, sarcastic and otherwise toxic behavior - but did not ban their Codeberg.org account with, idk, 2-3 random repositories.

Some people just don't work well in places with other people (or they might be annoying/disruptive) - but that alone may not be reason enough to exclude them from all repositories hosted on Codeberg.org.

This principle may also apply to Codeberg.org services as well: Someone may abuse our CI (or otherwise violates the terms for using it), and we may simply prevent them from using our CI. Or, depending on the severity and if it's a matter beyond reasonable doubt, the action taken might be stricter.

We have banned people (i.e. known bad faith actors) preemptively from our Matrix chats before. We have banned people that received repeated warnings over concern trolling, sarcastic and otherwise toxic behavior - but did not ban their Codeberg.org account with, idk, 2-3 random repositories. Some people just don't work well in places with other people (or they might be annoying/disruptive) - but that alone may not be reason enough to exclude them from all repositories hosted on Codeberg.org. This principle may also apply to Codeberg.org services as well: Someone may abuse our CI (or otherwise violates the terms for using it), and we may simply prevent them from using our CI. Or, depending on the severity and if it's a matter beyond reasonable doubt, the action taken might be stricter.

Copy link