30
201
Fork
You've already forked forgejo
40

CB/ui: Use 'Association' title in footer #76

Closed
n0toose wants to merge 29 commits from (deleted):codeberg-1.20-change-e.V.-footer-header into codeberg-1.20
pull from: (deleted):codeberg-1.20-change-e.V.-footer-header
merge into: Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-1.20
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-15
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-16
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-14
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-13-moderation
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-13
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-12
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-11
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-12-moderation
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-10
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-9
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-8
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-7
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-7-sha256-speedup
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-1.21
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-7-non-org-users
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-1.20
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-1.19
Codeberg-Infrastructure:testing-1.19
Codeberg-Infrastructure:codeberg-1.18
Contributor
Copy link

... instead of "Codeberg e.V.", which may feel repetitive and confusing
towards international audiences at a first glance.

... instead of "Codeberg e.V.", which may feel repetitive and confusing towards international audiences at a first glance.
... instead of "Codeberg e.V.", which may feel repetitive and confusing
towards international audiences at a first glance.
Author
Contributor
Copy link

I've been on a serious grind with the Codeberg frontend contributions, but I did not do this in
Codeberg/forgejo#75 as I found it too minor for it to be a blocker - I also considered the implications w.r.t. rebasing.

I've been on a serious grind with the Codeberg frontend contributions, but I did not do this in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/forgejo/pulls/75 as I found it too minor for it to be a blocker - I also considered the implications w.r.t. rebasing.
Contributor
Copy link

Was this manually merged at some point? It looks like the current footer reflects this change

Was this manually merged at some point? It looks like the current footer reflects this change
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Merged here: Codeberg/forgejo@3f072845f8

Merged here: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/forgejo/commit/3f072845f8096e2a24c447428a1fd56a22cc73d6
n0toose closed this pull request 2023年09月24日 14:33:45 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

Doesn't this repository allow pull requests to be marked as manually merged?

Doesn't this repository allow pull requests to be marked as manually merged?

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo!76
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo
No description provided.
Delete branch "(deleted):codeberg-1.20-change-e.V.-footer-header"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?