Run aspell through gsl-shell-index - gsl-shell.git - gsl-shell

index : gsl-shell.git
gsl-shell
summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrancesco Abbate <francesco.bbt@gmail.com>2012年02月06日 09:44:33 +0100
committerFrancesco Abbate <francesco.bbt@gmail.com>2012年02月06日 21:43:55 +0100
commita0570c9bf3a331e7dc22469fb3f0af1e9c6e532c (patch)
tree70c634316935094df66a13a9284d2d0485f2498f /doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst
parent54bb809db09529ffdf449a536d1de6c05744f885 (diff)
downloadgsl-shell-a0570c9bf3a331e7dc22469fb3f0af1e9c6e532c.tar.gz
Run aspell through gsl-shell-index
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst')
-rw-r--r--doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst 6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst b/doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst
index 76374332..fff152e4 100644
--- a/doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst
+++ b/doc/gsl-shell-index/benchmarks.rst
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
Benchmarks
==========
-The performance of the algorithms implemented in GSL Shell have been tested agaist an equivalent C implementation.
+The performance of the algorithms implemented in GSL Shell have been tested against an equivalent C implementation.
The purpose of the benchmarks is twofold. One of the objectives is to test the correctness of the results against the native GSL implementation while the other is to compare C and Lua implementation in term of performance.
-The performance is measured simply in term of time of execution, no attemt has been done to add other factors like memory utilisation or others.
+The performance is measured simply in term of time of execution, no attempt has been done to add other factors like memory utilization or others.
Besides the benchmark of optimized C code the LuaJIT2 implementation was tested with and without the JIT support enabled.
When the JIT support is disabled (option ``-joff``) the algorithm is executed in purely interpreted mode.
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ This difference can affect the execution speed and should be kept in mind.
Otherwise there is nothing that prevents the implementation in GSL Shell of an ODE integrator in array form.
This is actually planned to be done in the near future.
-For all the other algorithms the GSL implementation closely mirror the GSL interface and the comparaison is aboslutely fair.
+For all the other algorithms the GSL implementation closely mirror the GSL interface and the comparison is absolutely fair.
Technical details
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025年09月17日 10:26:28 +0000

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /