Message93057
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
loewis, ronaldoussoren |
| Date |
2009年09月24日.07:30:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.4931462e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4ABA566C.9010003@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1253616536.4.0.145439176425.issue6834@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> This version uses posix_spawn rather than execv to start the real
> interpreter.
In what way is that better? It creates a new process (IIUC); therefore,
I think that using it is worse than using execv. Anybody killing the
pythonw process would only kill the wrapper.
> The main advantage of the new implementation is that 'arch
> -ppc pythonw' works as expected, with the current version of pythonw the
> 'arch' command only affects the pythonw executable and not the real
> interpreter.
I suppose this would also be possible through execv? |
|