This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, jafo, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年04月08日.15:32:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.22736476 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1207668735.95.0.188478114609.issue2197@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Python-3000 discussion <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python- 3000/2008-March/012753.html> did not reveal any opposition to the idea of batch processing of dict displays. However, a compromise suggestion was made to limit batches to 256 items <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-March/012829.html>. I don't think this type of micro-optimization belongs to the core. A rare application that would benefit from limited size batch processing can do so explicitly using dict.update. See also relevant discussion at issue2292 (starting at msg65111). I believe this issue can be reopen. I will submit documentation patch if the change is accepted in principle. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月08日 15:32:16 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.227365 -> 0.22736476 recipients: + belopolsky, rhettinger, jafo |
| 2008年04月08日 15:32:16 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.227365 -> 0.227365 messageid: <1207668735.95.0.188478114609.issue2197@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月08日 15:32:15 | belopolsky | link | issue2197 messages |
| 2008年04月08日 15:32:14 | belopolsky | create | |