This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | twouters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, twouters |
| Date | 2008年04月07日.20:02:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.081526235 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm not sure how this matters. The order of evaluation is the same, the BUILD_SET implementation just hashes the evaluated items in a different order. You can't really rely on that particular order as it's tied closely to the stack representation CPython uses. I also see no practical reason -- or even practical *way* -- to abuse the hashing order. But you have given me an idea on how to improve some of the code in the BUILD_*_UNPACK opcodes, hmm. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月07日 20:02:10 | twouters | set | spambayes_score: 0.0815262 -> 0.081526235 recipients: + twouters, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, belopolsky |
| 2008年04月07日 20:02:10 | twouters | set | spambayes_score: 0.0815262 -> 0.0815262 messageid: <1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月07日 20:02:09 | twouters | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2008年04月07日 20:02:08 | twouters | create | |