Message 363695 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	terry.reedy
Recipients	Dave Liptack, gvanrossum, miss-islington, terry.reedy
Date	2020年03月09日.06:16:09
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1583734569.47.0.402131520845.issue39852@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
Is it the temporal ambiguity (fixed by adding 'now', which is in the blurbs) or the descriptive versus command style (as with 'Returns' versus 'Return') that you do not like? If the latter, the devguide could use augmentation. The only relevant 'guidance' I found is this descriptive example in https://devguide.python.org/pullrequest/#making-good-commits: "the spam module is now more spammy". This seems similar to "IDLE context menu now clears selection". I don't see anything about commit messages in https://devguide.python.org/committing/, which seems like another likely place for such.

Content

Is it the temporal ambiguity (fixed by adding 'now', which is in the blurbs) or the descriptive versus command style (as with 'Returns' versus 'Return') that you do not like? If the latter, the devguide could use augmentation.
The only relevant 'guidance' I found is this descriptive example in https://devguide.python.org/pullrequest/#making-good-commits: "the spam module is now more spammy". This seems similar to "IDLE context menu now clears selection". I don't see anything about commit messages in https://devguide.python.org/committing/, which seems like another likely place for such.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020年03月09日 06:16:09	terry.reedy	set	recipients: + terry.reedy, gvanrossum, miss-islington, Dave Liptack
2020年03月09日 06:16:09	terry.reedy	set	messageid: <1583734569.47.0.402131520845.issue39852@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020年03月09日 06:16:09	terry.reedy	link	issue39852 messages
2020年03月09日 06:16:09	terry.reedy	create

homepage