Message314670
| Author |
sblondon |
| Recipients |
sblondon |
| Date |
2018年03月29日.20:07:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1522354060.39.0.467229070634.issue33183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
In several cases, tests use ```self.assertTrue(a in b)```. Using ```self.assertIn(a, b)``` seems to be better.
For examples:
./Lib/test/test_inspect.py:
self.assertTrue('(po, pk' in repr(sig))
./Lib/test/test_configparser.py:
self.assertTrue('that_value' in cf['Spacey Bar'])
./Lib/test/test_collections.py:
self.assertTrue(elem in c)
There are some cases where ```self.assertTrue(a not in b)``` could be replaced by ```self.assertNotIn(a, b)```
./Lib/tkinter/test/test_ttk/test_widgets.py:
self.assertTrue('.' not in value)
./Lib/test/mapping_tests.py:
self.assertTrue(not ('a' in d))
self.assertTrue('a' not in d)
$ find . -name "*.py" | xargs grep -r "assertTrue.* in "
finds 131 occurences but there are some false positives inside the output.
I can write a patch if you are interested. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018年03月29日 20:07:40 | sblondon | set | recipients:
+ sblondon |
| 2018年03月29日 20:07:40 | sblondon | set | messageid: <1522354060.39.0.467229070634.issue33183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018年03月29日 20:07:40 | sblondon | link | issue33183 messages |
| 2018年03月29日 20:07:40 | sblondon | create |
|