homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: Refactoring: replacing some assertTrue by assertIn
Type: enhancement Stage: resolved
Components: Tests Versions:
process
Status: closed Resolution: duplicate
Dependencies: Superseder: Using appropriate checks in tests
View: 16510
Assigned To: Nosy List: sblondon, serhiy.storchaka
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2018年03月29日 20:07 by sblondon, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (2)
msg314670 - (view) Author: Stéphane Blondon (sblondon) * Date: 2018年03月29日 20:07
In several cases, tests use ```self.assertTrue(a in b)```. Using ```self.assertIn(a, b)``` seems to be better.
For examples:
./Lib/test/test_inspect.py:
 self.assertTrue('(po, pk' in repr(sig))
./Lib/test/test_configparser.py:
 self.assertTrue('that_value' in cf['Spacey Bar'])
./Lib/test/test_collections.py:
 self.assertTrue(elem in c)
There are some cases where ```self.assertTrue(a not in b)``` could be replaced by ```self.assertNotIn(a, b)```
./Lib/tkinter/test/test_ttk/test_widgets.py:
 self.assertTrue('.' not in value)
./Lib/test/mapping_tests.py:
 self.assertTrue(not ('a' in d))
 self.assertTrue('a' not in d)
$ find . -name "*.py" | xargs grep -r "assertTrue.* in "
finds 131 occurences but there are some false positives inside the output.
I can write a patch if you are interested.
msg314671 - (view) Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * (Python committer) Date: 2018年03月29日 20:29
This is a duplicate of issue16510.
History
Date User Action Args
2022年04月11日 14:58:59adminsetgithub: 77364
2018年03月29日 20:29:02serhiy.storchakasetstatus: open -> closed

superseder: Using appropriate checks in tests

nosy: + serhiy.storchaka
messages: + msg314671
resolution: duplicate
stage: resolved
2018年03月29日 20:07:40sblondoncreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /