Message135732
| Author |
jcon |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, jcon, nirai, pitrou, stutzbach, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月10日.19:38:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.6464255e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<BANLkTinG0+jSp5Sdy1kwjjaYiKNGw4h5Sg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1305055129.3569.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Content |
No problem for me either way.
I created issue12053 to track that.
- John O'Connor
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> > Also, while we're at it, would it be worthwhile for me to make a patch
> > for the prefech() method you proposed? Should a separate issue be
> > created for that? I know there was no definitive answer in the email
> > thread but it may be fun to experiment with as well.
>
> It would be worthwhile and I am certainly in favour it it, although I
> can't guarantee that it can go in in the end.
> (yes, a separate issue should definitely be created)
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9971>
> _______________________________________
> |
| Files |
|---|
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
unnamed
|
jcon,
2011年05月10日.19:38:53
|
|