homepage

>>> from datetime import datetime, timezone
 >>> dt = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
 >>> fmt = '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f %Z%z'
 >>> datetime.strptime(dt.strftime(fmt), fmt)
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 File "/cpython/Lib/_strptime.py", line 500, in _strptime_datetime
 tt, fraction = _strptime(data_string, format)
 File "/cpython/Lib/_strptime.py", line 337, in _strptime
 (data_string, format))
 ValueError: time data '2014-08-21 11:29:13.537251 UTC+00:00+0000'
 does not match format '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f %Z%z'
The issue is that dt.strftime('%Z') produces 'UTC+00:00'
(due to timezone.utc.tzname(dt) returning 'UTC+00:00')
instead of 'UTC' that strptime() accepts and %Z examples [1]
in the docs demonstrate.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/datetime.html#strftime-and-strptime-behavior 

This is a duplicate of #15873.

I don't see, how it is a duplicate. Everything works if pytz.utc (.tzname() == 'UTC')
is used instead of timezone.utc (.tzname() == 'UTC+00:00').
Everything works if UTC class from the example [1] 
in the tzinfo docs is used.
It only breaks due to the weird timezone.utc.tzname() return value.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/datetime.html#datetime.tzinfo.fromutc
Why does datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime('%Z')
(via timezone.utc.tzname(dt)) produce 'UTC+00:00'?
How is it motivated?
Is it documented somewhere?
Can datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime('%Z') be changed to return 'UTC'?

I see. I thought you were complaining about "%z" format not supporting "00:00" as in 
>>> from datetime import *
>>> datetime.strptime("00:00","%z")
Traceback (most recent call last):
 ..
ValueError: time data '00:00' does not match format '%z'
but your issue is that %Z does not parse "UTC+00:00" as in
>>> datetime.strptime("UTC+00:00x","%Zx")
Traceback (most recent call last):
 ..
ValueError: time data 'UTC+00:00x' does not match format '%Zx'
The name produced by timezone when no name is explicitly specified is documented:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/datetime.html#datetime.timezone.tzname
> Can datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime('%Z') be changed to return 'UTC'?
I think it can. I am surprised this did not come up in #5094 where UTC±hh:mm syntax was discussed.
The change would be trivial - just supply explicit name to utc singleton.
Please ask on Python-Dev if anyone would object.

See also <http://bugs.python.org/issue5094#msg106476>.
It looks like providing 'UTC' as the name of utc singleton was part of my original proposal. I have no recollection on why it was not implemented that way.

Akira,
I see that you participated in the original discussion (msg107608). We settled on str(timezone.utc) == 'UTC+00:00' and this was clearly a deliberate choice. I don't think we can revisit this now, but we can probably make strptime smart enough to parse UTC±hh:mm with %Z format code.

> I see that you participated in the original discussion (msg107608).
> We settled on str(timezone.utc) == 'UTC+00:00' and this was clearly a
> deliberate choice. I don't think we can revisit this now, but we can
> probably make strptime smart enough to parse UTC±hh:mm with %Z format
> code.
I see it advocates either 'UTC' or '+00:00' ('-00:00' is semantically
different) i.e., mutually exclusive options: UTC is special enough
(it is a real timezone that is widely used) to warrant 'UTC' name. On
the other hand '+HH:MM' (%:z) (note: *without* 'UTC' prefix) is easily
extendable for a fixed-offset tzinfo family and it allows to use %Z to
generate/parse date/time strings with rfc3339-like utc offset and the
"numeric" tzname() would stress that a fixed-offset datetime.timezone
doesn't represent "real" zoneinfo timezone.
UTC+HH:MM is neither here nor there: it is easily confusable with
deprecated :GMT+H, Etc/GMT-H zoneinfo timezones (I'm not sure about
the signs) and it doesn't help generate/parse isoformat() strings
e.g., it confuses dateutil.parser therefore *strftime('... %Z') with
datetime.timezone should be avoided.*
pytz is *the* module that exposes zoneinfo (*the* timezone database)
to Python. Its tzname() methods (and therefore strftime('%Z')) produce
timezone abbreviations such as 'UTC', 'EST', 'CST' (all %Z examples in
datetime docs) that may be ambiguous (the same abbreviation can be
used by several timezones) and in reverse -- a single timezone can use
several abbreviations for the same purpose (non-DST related). I find
'%Z%z' to be easier to read at a glance compared to %z along (imagine
you look at dozens timestamps at once e.g., in a log collected from
several machines).

OK, I guess we can change stdlib datetime.timezone.utc's str() to 'UTC'. Make sure to update both the C and the Python version, and the tests, and the docs. It's going to have to go into 3.6.

I left a couple comments on Rietveld.

Addressed review comments.

New changeset f904b7eb3981 by Alexander Belopolsky in branch 'default':
Closes Issue#22241: timezone.utc name is now plain 'UTC', not 'UTC-00:00'.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f904b7eb3981 

New changeset ea1bfb64e898 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #22241: Fix a compiler waring
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ea1bfb64e898