This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2011年05月21日 12:42 by ezio.melotti, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| issue12133.diff | ezio.melotti, 2011年05月21日 12:42 | Patch against 3.3 to fix the resource warning. | review | |
| Messages (13) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg136433 - (view) | Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年05月21日 12:42 | |
In case of error (e.g. timeout error), urllib.request leaves the socket open:
import urllib.request as ur
import socket
s = socket.socket()
s.bind(('localhost', 10000))
s.listen(0)
socket.setdefaulttimeout(5)
ur.urlopen('http://localhost.localdomain:10000')
outputs:
sys:1: ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket object, fd=4, family=2, type=1, proto=6>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 1146, in do_open
r = h.getresponse() # an HTTPResponse instance
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/http/client.py", line 1046, in getresponse
response.begin()
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/http/client.py", line 346, in begin
version, status, reason = self._read_status()
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/http/client.py", line 308, in _read_status
line = str(self.fp.readline(_MAXLINE + 1), "iso-8859-1")
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/socket.py", line 279, in readinto
return self._sock.recv_into(b)
socket.timeout: timed out
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 138, in urlopen
return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 369, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 387, in _open
'_open', req)
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 347, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 1163, in http_open
return self.do_open(http.client.HTTPConnection, req)
File "/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Lib/urllib/request.py", line 1148, in do_open
raise URLError(err)
urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error timed out>
>>>
AFAIU, when urlopen returns or raises, the socket can be closed, so the attached patch adds a "finally" that calls close() on the HTTPConnection object. The test suite pass (except for a mock that was missing the close method), but I'm not 100% sure that it's always safe to call close().
This ResourceWarning has been exposed by test_packaging.
|
|||
| msg136436 - (view) | Author: Senthil Kumaran (orsenthil) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年05月21日 13:05 | |
Hi Ezio, the connection can be closed via the finally call as you do in the patch. There are times when request object is re-used, but before the connection is made. It may also help to understand how the code in the packaging was invoking it. If you run the whole suite and see the nothing breaks (to ensure that something is not waiting for the socket and trying to close later), go ahead with the patch. |
|||
| msg136437 - (view) | Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年05月21日 13:16 | |
The packaging test (test_pypi_simple.py:test_uses_mirrors) creates a server and a mirror, starts the mirror only, tries to connect to the server, and then falls back on the mirror when the server raises a timeout error. The code in the first message does more or less the same, causing a timeout error and the resource warning. I haven't checked in detail the urllib tests, but the fact that there are no ResourceWarnings while running test_urllib might mean that this case isn't currently tested. |
|||
| msg138393 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年06月15日 21:53 | |
Oh, I wrote a similar patch to kill the ResourceWarning of test_pypi_simple (except that I didn't patch test_urllib2). |
|||
| msg138500 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) (Python triager) | Date: 2011年06月17日 12:02 | |
New changeset ad6bdfd7dd4b by Victor Stinner in branch '3.2': Issue #12133: fix a ResourceWarning in urllib.request http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ad6bdfd7dd4b New changeset 57a98feb508e by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.2) Issue #12133: fix a ResourceWarning in urllib.request http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/57a98feb508e |
|||
| msg138501 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) (Python triager) | Date: 2011年06月17日 12:06 | |
New changeset 18e6ccc332d5 by Victor Stinner in branch '2.7': Issue #12133: AbstractHTTPHandler.do_open() of urllib.request closes the HTTP http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/18e6ccc332d5 |
|||
| msg138502 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年06月17日 12:07 | |
I tested the patch on Python 3.3: the full test suite pass on Linux. I applied your patch on Python 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3, thanks Ezio. |
|||
| msg138532 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年06月17日 17:42 | |
Yay! |
|||
| msg140508 - (view) | Author: Ugra Dániel (daniel.ugra) | Date: 2011年07月16日 23:27 | |
This patch has introduced some problems for me with Python 3.2.1 (64-bit Arch Linux). The following code: with urllib.request.urlopen(url) as page: pass raises "ValueError: I/O operation on closed file." exception when url is "http://www.imdb.com/". When I removed "h.close()" (added by this patch) from request.py everything worked as expected. Interestingly other URLs work flawlessly with patched code ("http://www.google.com/" for example). I had no time to further investigate the differences between HTTP responses of "good" and "bad" sites... and I am by no means an HTTP expert :) Should I open a new bug report for this one or is it OK to just leave this comment here? |
|||
| msg140509 - (view) | Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年07月16日 23:29 | |
> Should I open a new bug report for this one or is it OK to just leave > this comment here? I think it's better to open a new issue, thank you. |
|||
| msg140565 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年07月18日 07:40 | |
I reopen the issue. |
|||
| msg140566 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年07月18日 07:41 | |
(Oh, I missed Antoine's comment, yes, reopen a new issue) |
|||
| msg140568 - (view) | Author: Ugra Dániel (daniel.ugra) | Date: 2011年07月18日 08:31 | |
Sorry, I've forgotten to post a reference to the new bug: #12576 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:57:17 | admin | set | github: 56342 |
| 2019年10月24日 10:29:32 | vstinner | link | issue13131 superseder |
| 2011年07月18日 08:31:54 | daniel.ugra | set | messages: + msg140568 |
| 2011年07月18日 07:41:53 | vstinner | set | status: open -> closed resolution: accepted -> fixed messages: + msg140566 |
| 2011年07月18日 07:40:25 | vstinner | set | status: closed -> open resolution: fixed -> accepted messages: + msg140565 |
| 2011年07月16日 23:29:36 | pitrou | set | messages: + msg140509 |
| 2011年07月16日 23:27:34 | daniel.ugra | set | nosy:
+ daniel.ugra messages: + msg140508 |
| 2011年06月17日 17:42:19 | eric.araujo | set | nosy:
+ eric.araujo, alexis messages: + msg138532 |
| 2011年06月17日 12:07:21 | vstinner | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg138502 |
| 2011年06月17日 12:06:30 | python-dev | set | messages: + msg138501 |
| 2011年06月17日 12:02:40 | python-dev | set | nosy:
+ python-dev messages: + msg138500 |
| 2011年06月15日 21:53:41 | vstinner | set | nosy:
+ vstinner messages: + msg138393 versions: + Python 2.7, Python 3.2 |
| 2011年05月21日 13:16:33 | ezio.melotti | set | messages: + msg136437 |
| 2011年05月21日 13:05:54 | orsenthil | set | nosy:
+ orsenthil messages: + msg136436 |
| 2011年05月21日 12:48:43 | nadeem.vawda | set | nosy:
+ nadeem.vawda |
| 2011年05月21日 12:42:35 | ezio.melotti | create | |