This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010年12月05日 18:53 by bquinlan, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (9) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg123433 - (view) | Author: Brian Quinlan (bquinlan) * (Python committer) | Date: 2010年12月05日 18:53 | |
multiprocessing generates fatal error "Invalid thread state for this thread" in PyThreadState_Swap This seems to happen on RHEL 5 and Centos 5.5 Here is the minimal repro: >>> import multiprocessing.managers >>> mpp = multiprocessing.Pool(4) >>> sm = multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager() >>> sm.start() See http://bugs.python.org/issue10517 for more details |
|||
| msg132410 - (view) | Author: Sandro Tosi (sandro.tosi) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月28日 18:17 | |
Hi Brian, are you able to replicate it? I just build 3.2 and default (3.3) on a Debian unstable system and wasn't able to replicate it (with a busy loop like while date ; do ./python -c "import multiprocessing.managers ; mpp = multiprocessing.Pool(4); sm = multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager(); sm.start()" ; done ) |
|||
| msg132418 - (view) | Author: Brian Quinlan (bquinlan) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月28日 20:20 | |
No, I wasn't able to replicate. |
|||
| msg132429 - (view) | Author: Sandro Tosi (sandro.tosi) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月28日 21:58 | |
can we close this issue then? |
|||
| msg132634 - (view) | Author: Senthil Kumaran (orsenthil) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月31日 04:08 | |
I wonder if this is CentOS and RHEL specific. Unable to reproduce this on Ubuntu. |
|||
| msg132681 - (view) | Author: Dave Malcolm (dmalcolm) (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月31日 15:43 | |
This is indeed looking like it's RHEL-specific. I was about to close it out as a duplicate of issue 10517, but I'm wondering why Brian chose to open it as a separate bug. |
|||
| msg132696 - (view) | Author: Brian Quinlan (bquinlan) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年03月31日 19:52 | |
Filing a new bug might have been a mistake. Once the investigation in issue 10517 isolated the failure as being in a different module, I thought it best to file a new bug with a minimal repro case. Fill free to cleanup. |
|||
| msg134590 - (view) | Author: Charles-François Natali (neologix) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年04月27日 16:07 | |
It's a duplicate of http://bugs.python.org/issue10517 |
|||
| msg134597 - (view) | Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) * (Python committer) | Date: 2011年04月27日 17:11 | |
Dupe of issue10517 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:57:09 | admin | set | github: 54841 |
| 2011年04月27日 17:16:36 | pitrou | unlink | issue10517 superseder |
| 2011年04月27日 17:16:34 | pitrou | set | superseder: multiprocessing generates a fatal error |
| 2011年04月27日 17:16:34 | pitrou | link | issue10632 superseder |
| 2011年04月27日 17:16:19 | pitrou | link | issue10517 superseder |
| 2011年04月27日 17:16:19 | pitrou | unlink | issue10517 dependencies |
| 2011年04月27日 17:11:18 | jnoller | set | status: open -> closed resolution: duplicate messages: + msg134597 |
| 2011年04月27日 16:07:51 | neologix | set | nosy:
+ pitrou, neologix messages: + msg134590 |
| 2011年03月31日 19:52:37 | bquinlan | set | messages: + msg132696 |
| 2011年03月31日 15:43:00 | dmalcolm | set | messages: + msg132681 |
| 2011年03月31日 04:08:35 | orsenthil | set | nosy:
+ dmalcolm, orsenthil messages: + msg132634 |
| 2011年03月28日 21:58:18 | sandro.tosi | set | messages: + msg132429 |
| 2011年03月28日 20:20:45 | bquinlan | set | messages: + msg132418 |
| 2011年03月28日 18:17:14 | sandro.tosi | set | nosy:
+ sandro.tosi messages: + msg132410 |
| 2011年01月03日 08:16:41 | bquinlan | set | stage: needs patch |
| 2010年12月05日 19:17:38 | bquinlan | set | title: multiprocessing gene -> multiprocessing generates a fatal error |
| 2010年12月05日 19:00:39 | bquinlan | link | issue10517 dependencies |
| 2010年12月05日 18:53:49 | bquinlan | create | |