উইকিপিডিয়া:বিষয়বস্তু মূল্যায়ন

"WP:CLASSES" শিরোনামকে এখানে পুনর্নির্দেশ করা হয়েছে। the catalogue of CSS classes জন্য WP:CLASS দেখুন।

নীল টিকচিহ্ন এই পাতাটি বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার editing guidelineর একটি নথি।

এটি একটি গ্রহণযোগ্য আদর্শ, যা সম্পাদকের অনুসরণের চেষ্টা করা উচিত, যদিও তা সাধারণ জ্ঞানে ও ব্যতিক্রমি ক্ষেত্রে সেরা পন্থা অবলম্বন করা হয়। এই পাতার যে-কোনো স্বতন্ত্র সম্পাদনা জনমতের ভিত্তিতে করা উচিত। কোন সন্দেহ থাকলে, প্রথমে তা আলাপ পাতায় আলোচনা করুন।

সংক্ষিপ্তসমূহ

The following system is used by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team for assessing how close we are to a distribution-quality article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though language quality and layout are also factors.

The quality assessments are mainly performed by participants in WikiProjects, who tag talk pages of articles. These tags are then collected by a bot, which generates output such as a log and statistics. For more information, see Using the bot . (Note that when more than one WikiProject has rated an article, the bot will take the best rating as the rating of the overall article.) The WP:1.0 team is nowটেমপ্লেট:When? setting up to use a second bot to select articles, based on the assessments performed by WikiProjects.

Two levels, GA (Good Article) and FA (Featured Article), are assessments made by independent editors, rather than by WikiProjects. GAs are generally reviewed by a single editor, and FA by a panel. Candidates are nominated by listing them at WP:Good article nominations and WP:Featured article candidates . Judgments are made according to the criteria at WP:Good article criteria and WP:Featured article criteria , and the results are listed at WP:Good articles and WP:Featured articles .

It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as this. More active WikiProjects have an assessment team. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment.

At present this assessment system is in use in the Wikipedia 1.0 project, and in several hundred WikiProjects on the English Wikipedia. As of May 2017, over 5.1 million articles have been assessed. Several other languages are also using this assessment system or a derivative thereof.

Grades

[সম্পাদনা ]

এই বাক্সটি:

লেবেল বিচারধারা পাঠকের অভিজ্ঞতা সম্পাদকের অভিজ্ঞতা উদাহরণ

নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ নির্বাচিত
{{FA-Class}} নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধের বর্তমান বিচারধারা অনুসারে যে নিবন্ধ পর্যালোচনার পরে নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ হিসাবে সংরক্ষিত হয়েছে।। চুড়ান্ত। সঠিক, আদ্যন্ত নিবন্ধটি বিশ্বকোষীয় তথ্যের জন্য একটি প্রামান্য উৎস। নতুন তথ্য প্রকাশ না হওয়া অবধি আর কোনো সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন নেই,কিন্তু লেখাতে আরও উন্নতিসাধন এখন সম্ভব । বাংলাদেশ

প্রনি
{{A-Class}} Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of June 2006)

Good article ভাল
{{GA-Class}} The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. Agriculture (as of June 2006)

২য় {{B-Class}}	Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
প্রাথমিক {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element such as a standard infobox. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Arithmetic (as of Oct 2005)
অসম্পূর্ণ {{অসম্পূর্ণ-শ্রেণী}}{{Stub-Class}}	এই ধরনের নিবন্ধ হয় অতি সংক্ষিপ্ত নতুবা এখানে সংশ্লিষ্ট তথ্যাবলী অসম্পূর্ণ বা এলোপাথারি হয়ে থাকে। প্রনির্বাচিত পর্যায়ের নিবন্ধে উন্নীত করতে এ ধরনের নিবন্ধে যথেষ্ট পরিমাণ সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন থাকে। সাধারণত এই ধরণের নিবন্ধ খুবই ছোট হয়, কিন্তু অপ্রাসঙ্গিক বা অবোধগম্য তথ্য সংযোজনের ফলে কখনো কখনো যথেষ্ট বড়ও হতে পারে।	যাদের কাছে নিবন্ধের বিষয়টিই অজানা, অথবা যারা বিষয়ের নামের বাইরে সেই বিষয়ে তেমন কিছুই অবগত নয়, হয়তো সেই ধরনের পাঠকদের কাছে এইধরনের নিবন্ধ কিছুটা প্রয়োজনীয়। এই ধরনের ভালো নিবন্ধগুলি অনেকটা কোনও বিষয়ের উপর আভিধানিক সংজ্ঞার সাথে তুলনীয়।	যেকোনও সম্পাদনা বা অতিরিক্ত তথ্যসংযোজনই এইধরনের নিবন্ধের উন্নতিকল্পে স্বাগত।	ঝুঁটিয়াল চটক (ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২০ তে যেমন ছিল)

Note: Some WikiProjects omit some of the standard classes, most often A-class, especially when they lack an assessment team.

Non-standard grades

[সম্পাদনা ]

সংক্ষিপ্ত

WP:NONSTANDARDCLASS

Some WikiProjects use other assessments for mainspace content that do not fit into the above scale:

Other WikiProject assessments
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
টেমপ্লেট:Current-Class	A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers an event or topic that is currently ongoing, such as a natural disaster or sports season.	Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event goes on.	Material added might quickly become obsolete.	2019–20 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season (as of August 2019)
টেমপ্লেট:Future-Class	A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers a future topic, e.g. an forthcoming election or album release, and article content may change as new information arises.	Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event draws near.	Material added might be speculative and should be carefully sourced.	Next United Kingdom general election (as of October 2019)
টেমপ্লেট:SL-Class	A list article that would otherwise be regarded as a stub. Used only by a few WikiProjects.	May be incomplete or provide little context.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	Pink flowers (as of July 2019)
টেমপ্লেট:SIA-Class	Any set index article (SIA) page falls under this class. These are list articles about a set of items of a specific type that also share the same (or similar) name.	The page lists related items of the same name.	An SIA need not follow the formatting rules for disambiguation pages	USS Yorktown (as of May 2018)
Disambig	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created.	Jackson (as of August 2019)
পুনর্নির্দেশিত	Any redirect falls under this class.	The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.	Ensure that the redirect is appropriately categorised.	American breakfast (as of October 2016)
টেমপ্লেট:Merge-Class	Any redirect that is the result of a page merge and has non-trivial history. Used only by a few WikiProjects.	The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.	Tag the redirect page with {{R from merge}}	Tamara (Dungeons & Dragons) (as of August 2018)
টেমপ্লেট:Needed-Class	May be used to identify redirects that could be expanded into articles, or articles with content that could be split off to form a new page.	Content may not yet exist for the desired topic.	Editors are encouraged to be bold when updating the encyclopedia.	Free City of Mainz (as of March 2018)
টেমপ্লেট:Deferred-Class	Used where quality assessments have been deferred to other WikiProjects. Only WikiProject Firearms uses this grade.	Does not affect the reader.	Should be used sparingly when project coverage is redundant.	Gary Kleck (as of January 2019)
NA	A page that does not fit into any other category. Used as a "catch-all" by all WikiProjects.	Depends on the type of page.	Depends on the type of page.	N/A

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment which utilises a parallel scheme of "CL-Class", "BL-Class" and "AL-Class" for list articles.

Non-mainspace content

[সম্পাদনা ]

Further grades are commonly used by WikiProjects to categorise relevant pages in other namespaces. The precise application of these grades may vary depending on their usage by individual WikiProjects.

Non-mainspace assessments
Label	Criteria	Example
Category	Any category falls under this class.	Category:George Orwell
টেমপ্লেট:Draft-Class	Any draft falls under this class. These are typically found in the Draft namespace, but may also be in the User namespace.	Draft:Example
ফাইল	Any file falls under this class; may also include timed text pages.	File:Flag of Australia.svg
টেমপ্লেট:FM-Class	Any file which has attained featured picture or featured sound status.	File:Felis silvestris silvestris.jpg
প্রবেশদ্বার	Any portal falls under this class.	Portal:Biography
Project	Any project page falls under this class; may also include help pages.	Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan
Template	Any template falls under this class; may also include modules or userboxes.	Template:Magnapop
টেমপ্লেট:User-Class	Any user page falls under this class.	User:Legoktm/afcnew.js

Note that some WikiProjects deal exclusively with non-mainspace content and may use their own customised assessment schemes tailored to a specific purpose: see Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals/Assessment for one such example.

For an index of all WikiProject assessment pages, see Category:WikiProject assessments.

Evolution of an article – an example

[সম্পাদনা ]

আরও দেখুন: outreach:Life of an Article

This clickable imagemap, using the article "Atom" as an example, demonstrates the typical profile for an article's development through the levels. Hold the mouse over a number to see key events, and click on a number to see that version of the article. Please note that until 2008, a C-class rating did not exist on the project, and as such this grading is retroactive. Also, in 2006 references were much less used, and inline references were quite rare; a barely-B-Class article today would typically have many more references than this article did in late 2006.

Importance assessment

[সম্পাদনা ]

There is a separate scale for rating articles for importance or priority, which is unrelated to the quality scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also a template at {{Importance scheme}}.

Statistics

[সম্পাদনা ]

The WP 1.0 bot tracks assessment data (article quality and importance data for individual WikiProjects) assigned via talk page banners. If you would like to add a new WikiProject to the bot's list, please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot.

The global summary table below is computed by taking the highest quality and importance rating for each assessed article in the main namespace.

সকল নিবন্ধ গুণাবলী এবং গুরুত্ব অনুযায়ী তালিকায়নকৃত

গুণাবলী গুরুত্ব

সর্বোচ্চ উচ্চ মধ্যম নিম্ন ??? সর্বমোট

নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ নির্বাচিত ১,০২৫ ১,৫৮৭ ১,৪৬৭ ৮৫৯ ১৬৭ ৫,১০৫

Featured list নিতা ১৩৪ ৫১৪ ৫৯৮ ৫৫১ ১২১ ১,৯১৮

প্রনি ১৮১ ৩২৯ ৫১৯ ২৭৬ ৭২ ১,৩৭৭

Good article ভাল ১,৬৭২ ৩,৮৭৮ ৭,৫৪২ ৭,১৯৭ ১,৪৯২ ২১,৭৮১

২য়	১০,৫৩৪	২০,১৪০	৩০,৫০০	২২,২৮৬	১২,৪৯০	৯৫,৯৫০
প	৮,০৯৯	২২,৯৯০	৫১,২২৩	৬২,১১১	৩৪,৪২৯	১৭৮,৮৫২
প্রাথমিক	১৫,১১৩	৬৪,৮৭৭	২৬১,৮০২	৫৯০,৪৭০	২৩৫,০৮৯	১,১৬৭,৩৫১
অসম্পূর্ণ	৩,৯০১	২৬,৮৯৯	১৯৬,৬৬৯	১,৪৪৭,৫১০	৮১৬,৮৯৫	২,৪৯১,৮৭৪
List	২,৩৮৪	৮,৯৪৪	২৫,৪৯২	৬৪,৬৭৯	৫৪,৮৪৬	১৫৬,৩৪৫
মূল্যায়িত	৪৩,০৪৩	১৫০,১৫৮	৫৭৫,৮১২	২,১৯৫,৯৩৯	১,১৫৫,৬০১	৪,১২০,৫৫৩
অনির্ধারিত	১১৮	৩২৮	১,৬৮৭	২০,০১৯	৪৬৫,২৩৯	৪৮৭,৩৯১
সর্বমোট	৪৩,১৬১	১৫০,৪৮৬	৫৭৭,৪৯৯	২,২১৫,৯৫৮	১,৬২০,৮৪০	৪,৬০৭,৯৪৪

FAQ

[সম্পাদনা ]

Purpose

[সম্পাদনা ]

What is the purpose of article assessments?: The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.
Are these ratings official?: Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

Assessing articles

[সম্পাদনা ]

Who can assess articles?: In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, assessing an article as "A-Class" generally requires the agreement of at least two editors, and the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as good articles or featured articles, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes.
How do I assess an article?: Consult the quality scale above; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the class parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use |class=B in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they are currently designated as such.
Does this have anything to do with the Wikipedia:Article Feedback Tool, which used to appear at the end of many articles?: No, that was a completely separate system.

Common concerns

[সম্পাদনা ]

Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do?: Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). See Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#Article tagging for more information.
What if I don't agree with a rating?: Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best rating.
Aren't the ratings subjective?: Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?: Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. Wikipedia:Peer review is the process designed to provide detailed comments.