But he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not this man of whom you speak.
2 Kings 8:12-15 And Hazael said, Why weepeth my lord? And he answered, Because I know the evil that thou wilt do unto the children of Israel: their strong holds wilt thou set on fire, and their young men wilt thou slay with the sword, and wilt dash their children, and rip up their women with child…
2 Kings 10:32 In those days the LORD began to cut Israel short: and Hazael smote them in all the coasts of Israel;
Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
“I do not know this man of whom you speak!”
Peter's denial is significant because it represents a complete disassociation from Jesus. By referring to Jesus as "this man," Peter distances himself from any personal connection or discipleship. This denial is particularly poignant given Peter's earlier bold declarations of loyalty (Mark 14:29-31). The phrase also highlights the fulfillment of Jesus' prediction and serves as a reminder of human frailty and the need for divine grace. This moment is a turning point for Peter, who later repents and becomes a foundational leader in the early Church, as seen in Acts 2. The denial contrasts with Jesus' own steadfastness in the face of suffering, emphasizing His role as the faithful and true witness.
• Peter’s desperation is showing. Moments earlier he simply denied knowing Jesus (Mark 14:68), but now he escalates, calling down curses upon himself if he is lying. Matthew’s parallel confirms the intensity: “At that he began to curse and swear…” (Matthew 26:74).
• Cursing here means invoking God’s judgment on himself—an act completely contrary to Jesus’ teaching that blessing and cursing should not flow from the same mouth (James 3:10).
• The scene fulfills Jesus’ precise prophecy: “today—this very night…you yourself will deny Me three times” (Mark 14:30). Scripture records it exactly as foretold, underscoring the reliability of Jesus’ words and the literal accuracy of the narrative.
• Swearing refers to taking an oath, likely calling upon God’s name to guarantee the truth of his denial. Yet Exodus 20:7 warns, “You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.”
• Hebrews 6:16 explains that oaths are intended to end all argument; Peter uses this solemn device to silence the bystanders.
• Ironically, his oath to prove innocence compounds his guilt, showing how fear can push a believer into deeper compromise when faith is set aside.
• The final denial is explicit. He will not even speak Jesus’ name—“this man.” Matthew 26:74 matches the wording, underlining that this was no slip of the tongue but a deliberate disassociation.
• Luke 22:61-62 adds the piercing detail that Jesus turned and looked at Peter right after this denial, leading Peter to weep bitterly. The literal historical event reveals the personal pain caused by sin.
• Jesus had warned: “Whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father” (Matthew 10:33). Yet grace is available; after the resurrection Jesus restores Peter (John 21:15-17), proving 2 Timothy 2:13 true: “If we are faithless, He remains faithful.”
Mark 14:71 records Peter’s third denial in escalating terms—cursing, swearing, flat refusal—demonstrating how quickly fear can drive a believer to shocking sin. The verse literally fulfills Jesus’ earlier prophecy, confirming Scripture’s accuracy while reminding us of both human frailty and divine faithfulness.
Parallel Commentaries ...