Acts 23:29 I found that the accusation involved questions about their own law, but there was no charge worthy of death or imprisonment.

[フレーム]


Paul Sent to Felix
…28and since I wanted to understand their charges against him, I brought him down to their Sanhedrin. 29 I found that the accusation involved questions about their own law, but there was no charge worthy of death or imprisonment. 30When I was informed that there was a plot against the man, I sent him to you at once. I also instructed his accusers to present their case against him before you.…

Treasury of Scripture

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

questions.

Acts 23:6-9
But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question…

Acts 18:15
But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters.

Acts 24:5,6,10-21
For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes: …

but.

Acts 25:7,8,11,25
And when he was come, the Jews which came down from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous complaints against Paul, which they could not prove…

Acts 26:31
And when they were gone aside, they talked between themselves, saying, This man doeth nothing worthy of death or of bonds.

Accusation Accused Bonds Charge Charged Clear Death Deserved Deserves Deserving Discovered Found Imprisonment Law Making Perceived Question Questions Worthy Accusation Accused Bonds Charge Charged Clear Death Deserved Deserves Deserving Discovered Found Imprisonment Law Making Perceived Question Questions Worthy 1. As Paul pleads his cause,
2. Ananias commands them to strike him.
7. Dissension among his accusers.
11. God encourages him.
14. The Jews' vow to kill Paul,
20. is declared unto the chief captain.
27. He sends him to Felix the governor.

I found that the accusation involved questions about their own law
This phrase highlights the nature of the charges against Paul, which were primarily theological and related to Jewish law rather than Roman law. The context is Paul's trial before the Roman authorities, where the accusations stem from his teachings about Jesus and the resurrection, which were contentious among Jewish leaders. This reflects the broader conflict between early Christians and Jewish authorities, as seen in Acts 18:15, where Gallio dismisses a similar case as a matter of Jewish law. The phrase underscores the distinction between religious disputes and civil crimes in the Roman legal system.

but there was no charge worthy of death or imprisonment
Here, the Roman official, likely referring to Lysias, acknowledges that the accusations against Paul do not merit severe punishment under Roman law. This is significant because it demonstrates the protection Paul received as a Roman citizen, a status that afforded him certain legal rights and privileges. Historically, Roman law required clear evidence of a crime for capital punishment or imprisonment, and religious disputes did not typically meet this threshold. This phrase also echoes the innocence of Jesus before Pilate, as seen in Luke 23:4, where Pilate finds no basis for a charge against Him. It highlights the theme of unjust persecution faced by early Christians and the providential care of God in safeguarding His messengers.

1. Paul
The apostle who is the central figure in this passage. He is being accused by Jewish leaders and is under Roman custody.

2. Claudius Lysias
The Roman commander who wrote the letter to Governor Felix, explaining the situation with Paul.

3. Jewish Leaders
They are accusing Paul of offenses related to Jewish law, but not Roman law.

4. Roman Law
The legal system under which Paul is being judged, which finds no fault in him worthy of death or imprisonment.

5. Jerusalem
The city where Paul was initially seized and where the accusations originated.Understanding Legal Contexts
Recognize the distinction between religious and secular legal systems. Paul’s situation teaches us the importance of understanding the legal context in which we operate.

Integrity in Accusations
Paul’s experience reminds us to maintain integrity and truthfulness, even when falsely accused. God’s justice prevails over human accusations.

God’s Sovereignty in Trials
Despite human accusations, God’s sovereignty is evident. Paul’s life was preserved, showing that God’s plans cannot be thwarted by human schemes.

Courage in Witnessing
Paul’s boldness in the face of false accusations encourages us to stand firm in our faith and witness, trusting God for protection and vindication.

Discernment in Disputes
The passage highlights the need for discernment in distinguishing between spiritual and secular matters, ensuring we address each appropriately.1. What is the meaning of Acts 23:29?

2. How does Acts 23:29 illustrate God's protection over Paul despite false accusations?

3. What can we learn from Paul's response to being accused in Acts 23:29?

4. How does Acts 23:29 connect with Jesus' promise of persecution in John 15:20?

5. How should Christians today respond to false accusations, as seen in Acts 23:29?

6. In what ways can Acts 23:29 encourage us to trust God's justice?

7. What does Acts 23:29 reveal about the nature of Roman justice during Paul's time?

8. How does Acts 23:29 challenge the perception of religious disputes versus legal matters?

9. Why was Paul found innocent of crimes deserving death or imprisonment in Acts 23:29?

10. What are the top 10 Lessons from Acts 23?

I found that the accusation

- Commander Claudius Lysias has personally investigated the uproar in Jerusalem (Acts 23:27-28).

- His statement, “I found,” underscores that the report comes from firsthand Roman inquiry, not rumor.

- Similar Roman findings recur: Pilate said of Jesus, “I find no basis for a charge” (Luke 23:4); Festus later tells Agrippa, “I found he had done nothing deserving death” (Acts 25:25).

- God’s providence is evident: repeated secular examinations confirm the innocence of His servant (compare Acts 18:14-15).

---

Involved questions about their own law

- Lysias recognizes the heart of the conflict is theological, rooted in Jewish interpretations—“questions about their own law” (cf. Acts 18:15; 25:19).

- Paul’s consistent defense centers on the hope of the resurrection (Acts 23:6; 24:14-15).

- The Roman official sees no civic crime, illustrating the distinction between spiritual disagreement and civil offense (see 1 Peter 4:15-16).

- God uses this clarity to move Paul from Jewish jurisdiction toward the wider Gentile mission promised in Acts 9:15.

---

But there was no charge

- “No charge” indicates total absence of legal evidence under Roman statutes (Acts 25:18).

- Paul mirrors Daniel’s blamelessness before pagan rulers (Daniel 6:4).

- For believers, this models a life so upright that even hostile scrutiny finds nothing actionable (Philippians 2:15).

---

Worthy of death or imprisonment

- Roman justice required proof proportionate to penalty; none appears here (Acts 26:31-32; 28:18).

- The phrase echoes Old Testament standards: a matter must be established by witnesses before capital punishment (Deuteronomy 17:6).

- Paul is therefore safeguarded by God through Roman law, fulfilling Jesus’ promise that His followers would stand before governors and kings as witnesses (Mark 13:9-11).

---

summary

Acts 23:29 records a Roman commander’s verdict: after careful inquiry he found the dispute with Paul was purely theological, anchored in Jewish law, and presented no crime meriting death or imprisonment. Cross-examination reaffirms Paul’s innocence, vindicates the gospel, and advances God’s plan to carry that gospel to Rome.

(29) Accused of questions of their law.--The points which probably presented themselves to the chiliarch's mind as the result of his inquiries were--(1) that the prisoner was accused of transgressing the rules of the Temple; (2) that the question at issue seemed to be whether he had seen a teacher named Jesus risen from the dead; (3) whether that teacher was entitled to the name of Christ.

Verse 29. - Found for perceived, A.V.; about for of, A.V. Questions; ζητήματα, only in the Acts, where it occurs five times (Acts 15:2; Acts 18:15; Acts 23:29; Acts 25:19; Acts 26:3). St. Luke also uses ζήτησις (Acts 25:20), as does St. Paul four times in the pastoral Epistles (1 Timothy 1:4, T.R.; 1 Timothy 6:4; 2 Timothy 2:23; Titus 3:9).

Parallel Commentaries ...


I found that
εὗρον (heuron)
Verb - Aorist Indicative Active - 1st Person Singular
Strong's 2147: A prolonged form of a primary heuro, which heureo is used for it in all the tenses except the present and imperfect to find.

the accusation
ἐγκαλούμενον (enkaloumenon)
Verb - Present Participle Middle or Passive - Accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's 1458: To bring a charge against, accuse. From en and kaleo; to call in, i.e. Bring to account.

involved
περὶ (peri)
Preposition
Strong's 4012: From the base of peran; properly, through, i.e. Around; figuratively with respect to; used in various applications, of place, cause or time.

questions
ζητημάτων (zētēmatōn)
Noun - Genitive Neuter Plural
Strong's 2213: A question, subject of inquiry, dispute. From zeteo; a search, i.e. a debate.

[about]
τοῦ (tou)
Article - Genitive Masculine Singular
Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.

their [own]
αὐτῶν (autōn)
Personal / Possessive Pronoun - Genitive Masculine 3rd Person Plural
Strong's 846: He, she, it, they, them, same. From the particle au; the reflexive pronoun self, used of the third person, and of the other persons.

Law,
νόμου (nomou)
Noun - Genitive Masculine Singular
Strong's 3551: From a primary nemo; law, genitive case, specially, (including the volume); also of the Gospel), or figuratively.

but
δὲ (de)
Conjunction
Strong's 1161: A primary particle; but, and, etc.

there was
ἔχοντα (echonta)
Verb - Present Participle Active - Accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's 2192: To have, hold, possess. Including an alternate form scheo skheh'-o; a primary verb; to hold.

no
μηδὲν (mēden)
Adjective - Accusative Neuter Singular
Strong's 3367: No one, none, nothing.

charge
ἔγκλημα (enklēma)
Noun - Accusative Neuter Singular
Strong's 1462: An accusation, charge. From egkaleo; an accusation, i.e. Offence alleged.

worthy
ἄξιον (axion)
Adjective - Accusative Neuter Singular
Strong's 514: Worthy, worthy of, deserving, comparable, suitable. Probably from ago; deserving, comparable or suitable.

of death
θανάτου (thanatou)
Noun - Genitive Masculine Singular
Strong's 2288: Death, physical or spiritual. From thnesko; death.

or
ἢ (ē)
Conjunction
Strong's 2228: Or, than. A primary particle of distinction between two connected terms; disjunctive, or; comparative, than.

imprisonment.
δεσμῶν (desmōn)
Noun - Genitive Masculine Plural
Strong's 1199: Or desmos des-mos' neuter and masculine respectively from deo; a band, i.e. Ligament or shackle; figuratively, an impediment or disability.


Acts 23:29 NIV
Acts 23:29 NLT
Acts 23:29 ESV
Acts 23:29 NASB
Acts 23:29 KJV

Acts 23:29 Study Bible
Acts 23:29 Biblia Paralela
Acts 23:29 Chinese Bible
Acts 23:29 French Bible
Acts 23:29 Catholic Bible

NT Apostles: Acts 23:29 I found him to be accused about (Acts of the Apostles Ac)