-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.8k
docs: Update one of You Might Not Need an Effect examples
#8216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Using setState inherently causes another re-render on change, even if according to the value nothing changed. useRef would be more accurate
Hi @ofek-frame!
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.
Action Required
In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.
Process
In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.
Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.
If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks!
Size changes
Details
📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for react-dev
This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖
This PR introduced no changes to the JavaScript bundle! 🙌
You Might Not Need an Effect exam,ples (削除ここまで)You Might Not Need an Effect examples (追記ここまで)
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Using setState inherently causes another re-render on change, even if according to the value nothing changed.
I think
useRefwould be more accurate.I see the lint error on the changed example - but it might be overzealous, as we indeed don't want to re-render on its change.