Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

kvm,physical network: change in storage traffic behaviour #563

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
shwstppr wants to merge 2 commits into apache:4.20
base: 4.20
Choose a base branch
Loading
from shapeblue:storage-traffic-behaviour-change

Conversation

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr commented Sep 15, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

Copy link
Contributor Author

@weizhouapache @rajujith we can add a change in release notes at the time of release, can you please review if we need this?

Copy link
Member

@weizhouapache weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

thanks @shwstppr

zones has changed. When a VLAN tag is specified for storage traffic,
a new vNet interface will be created on the storage bridge. If a
dedicated bridge is used for storage traffic, it is recommended not to
configure a VLAN tag for this traffic type.
Copy link
Contributor

@rajujith rajujith Sep 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is recommended not to
configure a VLAN tag for this traffic type

I think we should remove this statement, VLAN can be used for storage traffic, whether the bridge is dedicated to storage or it's used for other traffic as well.

Copy link
Member

@shwstppr
can you rebase with 4.20 and address @rajujith 's comment ? thanks

@shwstppr shwstppr changed the base branch from main to 4.20 November 13, 2025 11:05
@shwstppr shwstppr changed the base branch from 4.20 to main November 13, 2025 11:06 
Related: apache/cloudstack#11634 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
@shwstppr shwstppr force-pushed the storage-traffic-behaviour-change branch from 6db7766 to 12173c7 Compare November 13, 2025 11:12
@shwstppr shwstppr changed the base branch from main to 4.20 November 13, 2025 11:12
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan docbuild

Copy link

@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link

QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/563. (QA-JID 461)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rajujith rajujith rajujith left review comments

@weizhouapache weizhouapache Awaiting requested review from weizhouapache

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.20.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /