Is the GPL always the right license?
For software the GPL works well because it forces you to give
back any changes and enhancements. In other words the software
is free and you are free to change it but the price you pay is
that you must make your improvements available. This causes the
software to grow and improve over time.
For documentation that comes directly with the GPL software the
FDL (Free documentation license) is the right license because
it does the same things to documentation that the GPL does to
software.
What about documentation that does usually not get updated?
Well, there the GPL trick does not work because the feedback
chain that brings back any enhancements does not exist.
LinuxFocus was distributed for several years under the FDL but
the times are changing. As Linux becomes more and more
important it attracts also the bad guys who try to abuse the
system and make money without giving anything back. All you
have to do is print the articles, tell everybody how good you
are to help the open source community... and the money runs
into your pocket. The real work is done by others. You only
take and give nothing back. No new articles and no updates.
We like to have maximum freedom but we must stop those guys
especially when they send you their "happy open source
promotion mails" via MS-outlook.
creativecommons.org
has a number of licenses which are designed to stop such
exploits. They are still very free licenses but it is not the
GPL. We have therefore changed our license. For almost all our
readers there will be no change but anybody who tries to make
profit will have to give something back.
-- Guido Socher
© 2004 LinuxFocus
Click here to get to the
LinuxFocus contact persons list