CGD Paper


Page Contents: Abstract | Summary Chart | Author Search |

Lim HJ, Shin JH, Kim MN, Yong D, Byun SA, Choi MJ, Lee SY, Won EJ, Kee SJ, Kim SH, Shin MG (2020) Evaluation of Two Commercial Broth Microdilution Methods Using Different Interpretive Criteria for the Detection of Molecular Mechanisms of Acquired Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Four Common Candida Species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64(11)
Pubmed Entry


Abstract:The abilities of the new Vitek 2 AST-YS08 (YS08) and Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) systems to detect the resistances of Candida isolates to azoles and echinocandins were evaluated. In total, 292 isolates, including 28 Candida albicans (6 Erg11 and 2 Fks mutants), 57 Candida parapsilosis (26 Erg11 mutants), 24 Candida tropicalis (10 Erg11 and 1 Fks mutants), and 183 Candida glabrata (39 Pdr1 and 13 Fks mutants) isolates, were tested. The categorical agreements (CAs) between the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and YS08 fluconazole MICs obtained using clinical breakpoints were 92.4% (C. albicans), 96.5% (C. parapsilosis), and 87.0% (C. tropicalis), and the CAs between the CLSI and SYO MICs were 92.3% (C. albicans), 77.2% (C. parapsilosis), 100% (C. tropicalis), and 98.9% (C. glabrata). For C. glabrata, the CAs with the CLSI micafungin MICs were 92.4% and 55.5% for the YS08 micafungin and caspofungin MICs, respectively; they were 100%, 95.6%, and 98.9% for the SYO micafungin, caspofungin, and anidulafungin MICs, respectively. YS08 does not provide fluconazole data for C. glabrata; the CA with the CLSI fluconazole MIC was 97.8% for the YS08 voriconazole MIC, using an epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) of 0.5 mug/ml. Increased CAs with the CLSI MIC were observed for the YS08 MIC using CLSI ECVs (for fluconazole and C. tropicalis, 100%; for micafungin and C. glabrata, 98.9%) and for the SYO MIC using method-specific ECVs (for fluconazole and C. parapsilosis, 91.2%; for caspofungin and C. glabrata, 98.9%). Therefore, the YS08 and SYO systems may have different abilities to detect mechanisms of azole and echinocandin resistance in four Candida species; the use of method-specific ECVs may improve the performance of both systems.
Status: Published Type: Journal Article|Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PubMed ID: 32900684


Topics addressed in this paper
  • To find other papers on a gene and topic, click on the colored ball in the appropriate box.
    displays other papers with information about that topic for that gene.
    displays other papers in CGD that are associated with that topic.
    The topic is addressed in these papers but does not describe a specific gene or chromosomal feature.

  • To go to the Locus page for a gene, click on the gene name.

Topics
Genes linked to topics
ERG11
(C. parapsilosis)
ERG11
(C. albicans)
FKS1
(C. glabrata)
FKS2
(C. glabrata)
GSC1
(C. albicans)
GSL1
(C. albicans)
PDR1
(C. glabrata)
Candida albicans
Candida parapsilosis
Candida tropicalis
Sensitivity/response to drugs/other treatments
Techniques and Reagents
Author Searches
To find contact information or other publications by the authors of this paper, follow these three steps:

(1) Choose an author, (2) Choose a search parameter, (3) Click to implement.




AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /