WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: 2011年1月29日 18:58:06 +0200
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2011年1月29日 09:00:47 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D44365C.6030606@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=J-s+oc44wY-N_wQ+wQr=VhnG-EK48QYpx7y-Y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA18BFE6FF56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.40076de9f5.AANLkTim+T5yAfovgX2JsH9BMp3r6agxCqRxVBoG7acXT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=Nws9ULuk6MjoEJJJLh=zTf9yDJo5HnheX6sie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D407E80.1050209@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikNzgxxeKQHZ=dAzJAXB3RSU0tQ2421K3-dADO2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110129145638.GA2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D44365C.6030606@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008年05月17日)
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Christian Zoffoli wrote:
> Il 29/01/2011 15:56, Pasi Kärkkäinen ha scritto:
> [cut]
> > The trick is that the XAPI toolstack takes care of the locking,
> > so there's no need for CLVM.
>
> was the same also on the dead virtualiron.
>
Indeed, VirtualIron used the same normal LVM method.
I wouldn't be suprised if OracleVM (Oracle's current Xen based virtualization 
product) 
uses it aswell :)
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Possible bug with scsi disk and Xen , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Christian Zoffoli
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Javier Guerra Giraldez
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /