WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年1月26日 21:05:20 +0100
Cc: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2011年1月26日 12:07:16 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=Nws9ULuk6MjoEJJJLh=zTf9yDJo5HnheX6sie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070711q4c64f92au9baa6577524e5c5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3463f63d0908070726y630d320u3e3f1f1cae9b34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=J-s+oc44wY-N_wQ+wQr=VhnG-EK48QYpx7y-Y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA18BFE6FF56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.40076de9f5.AANLkTim+T5yAfovgX2JsH9BMp3r6agxCqRxVBoG7acXT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=Nws9ULuk6MjoEJJJLh=zTf9yDJo5HnheX6sie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110105 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
Il 26/01/2011 18:11, Freddie Cash ha scritto:
[cut]
> If there's anything that we've missed, let me know. :)
the exposed setup is very intesting but:
a) ZFS on freebsd is not as stable as on solaris
b) opensolaris is dead (oracle killed it)
c) we have no guarantee that in the future oracle will release updated code
d) NFS is slow ...NFS over RDMA is fast but freebsd has no open/official
infiniband stack
e) consistent snapshots are very different from backuping only files.
For example if you backup a DB server copying files is not enought you
have to dump also what you have in memory at the same time (the key word
is "at the same time")
Christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Javier Guerra Giraldez
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Christian Zoffoli
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Javier Guerra Giraldez
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Freddie Cash
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /