WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs)

To: John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs)
From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年1月27日 13:29:55 -0500
Cc: Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2011年1月27日 10:31:04 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D41B491.70205@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4064CD.8010005@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB9292@trantor > <20110127083537.GD29664@xxxxxxxx> <p06240870c96746abba41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D41B491.70205@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:08 PM, John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Getting somewhat off-topic, but I'm interested to know how AoE
>> handles network errors ? I assume there is some handshake to make
>> sure packets were delivered, rather than just "fire and forget" !
>
> Ethernet itself has checksumming and error correction, so all of this is
> handled in layer 2.
Ethernet hardware+drivers do indeed checksum and verify every frame;
but in case of invalid checksum, it simply discards the frame. it
doesn't retransmit, so it's not error correction; just error detection
(could it be called 'error elimination'?)
-- 
Javier
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs) , John Madden
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] pvusb + xen 4 , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs) , John Madden
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs) , Simon Hobson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /